Ahead of a fast-approaching jury trial, point-of-sale and e-commerce organization Lightspeed has proposed a legal strategy aimed at preventing the potential utilization of past litigation victories by their opposition. Specifically, the Pennsylvania-based patent company is being asked not to reference a previous $13M verdict victory that took place in Texas federal court.
According to Law360’s report, the company has petitioned U.S. District Judge Alan Albright to strike this matter from potential consideration in the course of the imminent trial. This previous litigation outcome functions as a potentially influential narrative element, given its substantial monetary verdict and relevance to the nature of the businesses involved – specifically those operating in point-of-sale services.
The focus of the current legal dispute has not been detailed; however, Lightspeed is moving preemptively to prevent the prior $13M verdict from swaying the trial proceedings. Given the magnitude of the previous verdict, and its potential implications for similar businesses in the sector, it stands to reason that this tactic is seen as a necessary measure in their litigation strategy.
This development not only highlights the highly strategic nature of high-stake business litigations, but also underlines the crucial role past verdicts can play in the narrative of the courtroom – useful considerations for legal professionals navigating similar waters.