Supreme Court’s Decision on Roundup Litigation Could Reshape State and Federal Jurisdiction in Mass Torts

The ongoing litigation involving Monsanto’s Roundup weed killer has brought to the forefront the complex interplay between state and federal courts, as well as the intricate nature of mass public harms litigation. At the heart of the dispute is whether federal pesticide regulation preempts state law, a question currently under consideration by the Supreme Court…

Read More

Contested Roundup Settlement Sparks Legal Debate Over Class Action Fairness

The opposition to the $7.25 billion Roundup class action settlement has intensified as two co-lead plaintiffs’ counsel in the multidistrict litigation have sought judicial intervention. Earlier this month, these legal representatives filed an injunction motion urging U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria to halt the agreement that was preliminarily approved by Judge Timothy Boyer in St….

Read More

Philadelphia Court Upholds Judge’s Role Amid Conflict Concerns in Zantac Litigation Against GlaxoSmithKline

Recent developments in the Zantac mass tort litigation have gained significant attention as a Philadelphia judge, tasked with overseeing these cases against GlaxoSmithKline, has once again denied a motion to recuse himself. The request for recusal stemmed from the judge’s wife’s professional connection to a firm representing a defendant in the ongoing litigation. Despite concerns…

Read More

New Jersey Supreme Court Upholds Disqualification of Beasley Allen in High-Stakes Talc Litigation

The New Jersey Supreme Court has decided not to reconsider a decision that disqualified the Beasley Allen Law Firm from representing clients in a high-profile litigation case concerning Johnson & Johnson’s talcum powder. This decision effectively upholds a previous ruling by a lower court, which had removed the firm from the multi-county litigation, a move…

Read More

New Jersey Supreme Court Denies Beasley Allen Reentry in Johnson & Johnson Talc Lawsuit

“`html The New Jersey Supreme Court has turned down a request from Beasley Allen, a prominent plaintiff’s law firm, to reenter the ongoing talc litigation against Johnson & Johnson. This decision effectively bars the firm from rejoining the legal battle over claims that the company’s talc products, including baby powder, caused cancer. Beasley Allen’s involvement…

Read More

Texas Supreme Court Denies Petitions, Upholds Defense Verdict in Winter Storm Uri Mass Tort Cases

The long-running legal saga surrounding Winter Storm Uri has reached a pivotal moment as the Texas Supreme Court denied mandamus petitions in five bellwether cases. This decision effectively seals a defense verdict in one of Texas’ largest mass torts cases, impacting over 200 lawsuits and approximately 30,000 plaintiffs who sought more than $1 billion in…

Read More

New Jersey Court Upholds Beasley Allen Disqualification in Johnson & Johnson Talc Lawsuit

In a significant decision, a New Jersey state appeals court has declined to halt its ruling disqualifying the Beasley Allen Law Firm from representing plaintiffs in the ongoing multicounty litigation involving Johnson & Johnson’s talc-based baby powder. This development comes as Beasley Allen sought a stay on the disqualification order, which affects numerous cases alleging…

Read More

Disqualification Hearing in Johnson & Johnson Talcum Powder MDL Poses Major Test for Beasley Allen

In the ongoing multidistrict litigation (MDL) involving Johnson & Johnson’s talcum powder, Beasley Allen, a leading plaintiffs’ firm, faces a significant challenge. The firm, instrumental in representing plaintiffs who allege that the company’s talc-based products caused cancer, is embroiled in a potential disqualification hearing scheduled for February 24 before U.S. Magistrate Judge Rukhsanah Singh. This…

Read More

The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Transforming Mass Tort Litigation and Reducing Legal Costs

The introduction of artificial intelligence in the legal sphere is reshaping the handling of mass torts, with the potential to significantly lower costs and enhance efficiency. Traditionally, mass tort litigation has been an arena marked by high complexity and substantial financial burdens. However, AI promises to transform these dynamics by streamlining document review, case management,…

Read More

Bankruptcy Courts Under Pressure: Special Masters Proposed to Manage Surge in Mass Tort Cases

The growing deluge of mass tort cases in bankruptcy courts is prompting calls for the appointment of special masters to streamline proceedings and ensure efficiency. This demand comes as courts grapple with complex cases involving large numbers of claims and intricate legal issues. Mass tort cases, which often involve thousands of claimants affected by defective…

Read More

Delaware Court Allows Lawsuit to Proceed Against Janus Henderson in Alleged Hostile Takeover Scheme

A Delaware Chancery Court judge has permitted a lawsuit involving Janus Henderson Group, a notable entity in the asset management industry, to proceed. This legal action arises from allegations made by a mass torts litigation funder, who asserts that a subsidiary of Janus Henderson schemed to take control over its operations. The judge found the…

Read More

California Court Tackles Child Exploitation Allegations in Major Roblox Lawsuit

In California’s Northern District, a new multidistrict litigation (MDL) concerning child exploitation allegations against Roblox Corporation is taking shape. Five esteemed attorneys—W. Mark Lanier, Bryan Aylstock, Sarah London, Alexandra Walsh, and Bob Hilliard—are currently contending for leadership roles in the proceedings. With 85 lawsuits consolidated by Chief Judge Richard Seeborg, the stakes of the litigation…

Read More

Unveiling the Dark Side of Mass Torts: Elizabeth Burch Exposes Pelvic Mesh Litigation Exploitation in “The Pain Brokers”

Elizabeth Burch, a respected professor at the University of Georgia School of Law and an authority on mass torts, has recently brought attention to a controversial issue within the legal system with her book, The Pain Brokers. This insightful work delves into an unsettling scheme that took place during the pelvic mesh litigation, an event…

Read More

Sidley Austin LLP Bolsters Litigation Team with Veteran Partner Paul Boehm in Washington, D.C.

Sidley Austin LLP has announced the addition of Paul Boehm as a partner in its Washington, D.C., office, where he will serve as a global co-leader of the firm’s Product Liability and Mass Torts practice. Boehm joins Sidley after more than two decades at Williams & Connolly LLP, where he was a litigation partner. ([sidley.com](https://www.sidley.com/en/newslanding/newpressreleases/2025/12/first-chair-trial-and-leading-product-liability-lawyer-paul-boehm-joins-sidley-as-partner?utm_source=openai))…

Read More

Certum Launches Management Services Organization to Support Mass Tort Law Firms

Litigation funder Certum has announced the launch of a management services organization (MSO) designed specifically for mass tort law firms. This strategic move aims to cater to the operational needs of firms dealing with mass tort cases, enabling them to handle large volumes of complex legal claims more efficiently. The fungibility of litigation resources and…

Read More

California’s New Fee-Sharing Law Faces Legal Challenge from Leading Mass Tort Attorney

In a significant legal development, mass tort attorney R. Brent Wisner has initiated a lawsuit aimed at obstructing California’s AB 931, a law poised to effectuate changes in attorney fee-sharing practices starting January 1. Wisner, representing the firm Wisner Baum, has expressed concerns that the legislation will disrupt his legal operations not only in California…

Read More

Federal Appeals Court Overturns Key Opioid Ruling Amidst Rising Legal Challenges in California’s Gig Economy

In a significant development, a federal appeals court has overturned a pivotal decision related to opioid litigation, marking a new chapter in the ongoing legal battles surrounding the opioid crisis. This decision impacts the liability and financial responsibility of pharmaceutical companies and distributors, which have been at the center of thousands of lawsuits across the…

Read More

Fourth Circuit Court Revives West Virginia Opioid Public Nuisance Case, Setting Legal Precedent

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit has revived a critical public nuisance lawsuit, reaffirming that the conditions arising from the over-distribution of opioids can be considered a public nuisance under West Virginia common law. This decision reopens litigation against opioid distributors including those represented by Reed Smith, Williams & Connolly, and Covington…

Read More

“Mass Tort Fundraiser Sues NY Law Firm Over Alleged Investment Mismanagement Amidst 3M and Johnson & Johnson Litigations”

A recent lawsuit has emerged involving a mass tort funder who has taken legal action against a New York-based law firm over a failed investment tied to high-profile cases against 3M and Johnson & Johnson. The funder alleges that the law firm provided misleading information, impacting their financial participation in mass tort cases linked to…

Read More

Judge Directs Attorney Amidst Paraquat Settlement Concerns as Mass Torts Face Legal Shifts

In a recent development in the legal sphere, a judge handling the Paraquat litigation has issued a directive to attorney Aimee Wagstaff, urging her not to disrupt ongoing settlements. This emphasizes the complexities legal professionals face when navigating the intricacies of high-stakes lawsuits, particularly when settlements are on the line. The directive aims to ensure…

Read More

Johnson & Johnson Challenges Mass Tort Verdict in Landmark Appeal Against “Litigation Trap”

In a move that has drawn significant attention from the legal community, Johnson & Johnson (J&J) is pursuing an appeal that could see the company confront what it describes as a “litigation trap.” The case stems from a multi-billion-dollar verdict related to claims that J&J’s talc products caused cancer, a cornerstone issue in mass tort…

Read More

Federal Judges Mandate Filing of Unfiled Claims in High-Profile Multidistrict Litigation Cases

In a significant development within multidistrict litigation, two federal judges overseeing high-profile cases have taken the unusual step of mandating that plaintiffs’ lawyers file lawsuits that had previously remained unfiled. These directives come amidst concerns over a large backlog of claims associated with multidistrict litigation (MDL) dockets involving the injectable birth control Depo-Provera and toxic…

Read More