Amgen Held Liable for Patent Infringement in Landmark Mouse Antibody Case, Ordered to Pay $20.2 Million

A recent decision by a federal jury in Delaware has resulted in Amgen Inc. and its subsidiary, Teneobio Inc., being held liable for willful infringement of a mouse antibody patent owned by Harbour Antibodies BV and others. The jury awarded Harbour Antibodies BV $20.2 million, representing the full amount sought. The case has drawn attention…

Read More

Third Circuit Court Weighs AI and Fair Use in Landmark Copyright Case

In a significant hearing, the Third Circuit Court examined the complexities of artificial intelligence’s interplay with copyright laws—specifically how AI training models intersect with fair use principles. The court’s focus was not on hypothetical scenarios, but on issues that have long colored copyright disputes: the creation of copies, their purpose, and whether new works transform…

Read More

Legal Battle Erupts Between Insta360 and DJI Over Camera Patents in Eastern Texas

Insta360 has initiated legal actions against drone and camera maker DJI Technology Co., filing two lawsuits in the Eastern District of Texas. These suits allege that DJI infringed upon Insta360’s camera patents. This development comes shortly after DJI launched its own legal maneuvers, accusing Insta360’s Luna line of handheld gimbal cameras of patent infringement. The…

Read More

Judge Pauses InterDigital’s Patent Suit Against Disney Amid Ongoing Dolby Dispute

In an intriguing development within the tech and entertainment sectors, a California federal judge has decided to pause a patent infringement lawsuit filed by InterDigital Inc. against The Walt Disney Co. The case concerns allegations of patent violations relating to wireless technology, which are now sidelined as a separate legal challenge with Dolby Laboratories takes…

Read More

Mass Arbitrations Surge as Companies Rethink Legal Strategies in Wake of Plaintiff Tactics

In a recent discussion with legal industry insiders, the chief executive of JAMS highlighted a notable rise in mass arbitrations within employment and other sectors. This trend has been driven by innovative strategies from plaintiff-side firms challenging mandatory arbitration clauses stipulated by companies. Such clauses generally push disputes out of the courtroom and into private…

Read More

Boston Insider Trading Case Borrows “Varsity Blues” Defense Strategy, Probing Legal Boundaries

In the heart of Boston’s federal courtroom, a new phase in insider trading litigation is unfolding, drawing unexpected inspiration from the strategies utilized during the “Varsity Blues” admissions scandal. Defendants in the current insider trading case, which allegedly involves confidential deal information mishandled from prominent law firms, are poised to employ a defense that echoes…

Read More

Google’s Supreme Court Bid Could Redefine Patent Dispute Framework with “Settled Expectations” Doctrine Challenge

On April 27, 2026, Google filed a petition for a writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of Google LLC v. VirtaMove Corp., challenging the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s (USPTO) practice of denying inter partes review (IPR) petitions based on the “settled expectations” doctrine. This doctrine allows the Patent Trial…

Read More

General Counsels Urge Law Graduates to Embrace Nonlinear Career Paths Amid Industry Shifts

In a rapidly evolving legal industry, general counsels (GCs) are encouraging new law graduates to embrace a career path that may be uncertain and nonlinear. This perspective is becoming increasingly relevant as the legal landscape undergoes significant transformations, demanding adaptability and a willingness to pursue diverse experiences. Legal professionals have observed that the traditional linear…

Read More

“Emerging Legal Trends: Synthetic Fragrance Lawsuits, Deceptive Marketing, and Privacy Concerns with Apple AirTags”

The landscape of litigation is shifting as new consumer protection concerns arise, highlighting evolving trends in the legal realm. Three emerging areas are drawing significant attention: class action lawsuits over synthetic fragrances, deceptive promotional emails labeled as “Limited Time Only,” and privacy issues connected to Apple AirTags. In recent months, there has been a marked…

Read More

U.S. Court Upholds Salesforce IP Victory, Denies Full Review in Patent Case

Salesforce Inc. has successfully defended its intellectual property win, as a full review by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit was declined. The case, originally filed by Applications in Internet Time LLC (AIT), sought to revive allegations of patent infringement against the cloud-based solutions giant. This decision reinforces an earlier ruling favoring…

Read More

Barnes & Thornburg LLP Sanctioned $172,000: A Judicial Warning on Litigation Tactics

The U.S. District Court’s recent decision to impose sanctions amounting to $172,000 on Barnes & Thornburg LLP underscores the judiciary’s growing stance against questionable litigation tactics. This penalty stems from the firm’s unsuccessful attempt to file a disqualification motion that the court deemed inappropriate. The decision to hold the entire firm liable was influenced by…

Read More

Delaware Jury Rules in Favor of TVision Insights in Patent Dispute with Nielsen Co.

Recent developments in a Delaware federal court have delivered a significant verdict in the realm of intellectual property rights concerning TV audience measurement technologies. A jury has cleared TVision Insights Inc. of allegations made by The Nielsen Co., which claimed that TVision’s products unlawfully infringed upon a patent related to audio recognition technology used to…

Read More

London’s Legal Arena Faces Turbulence with Key Finance and Construction Litigation Cases

The legal landscape in London saw significant developments in the past week, underscored by high-stakes litigation involving major financial and corporate entities. Notably, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) initiated proceedings against a fund manager accused of offering investment services notwithstanding a pre-existing prohibition. This move by the FCA underscores the regulatory body’s ongoing efforts to…

Read More

Building Client Relationships: How New York Law Firms Leverage Courtside Seats to Bolster Connections

In a competitive legal industry, large law firms are continuously seeking innovative ways to enhance client relationships. The opportunity to strengthen these ties sometimes lies beyond boardroom negotiations and into more relaxed settings, such as courtside seats at a New York Knicks game. Several prominent New York firms, including those with substantial operations in the…

Read More

Judge Considers Sanctions for Trump’s Legal Team Over Missed Court Deadlines in BBC Case

The legal team representing former President Donald Trump in a case involving the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) may face sanctions following a delay in their response to court deadlines. The judge in Miami expressed concern over the attorneys’ handling of procedural requirements, suggesting the delay showed an “apparent disregard of court deadlines.” However, Trump’s lawyers…

Read More

Jackson Lewis Fortifies Its Litigation Team with Strategic Acquisition of Wage-Hour Specialists

Jackson Lewis, a prominent law firm known for its focus on labor and employment law, has strategically expanded its team by acquiring three experienced wage-hour litigators from the well-regarded firm Gordon Rees. This move underscores Jackson Lewis’s commitment to strengthening its litigation department and enhancing its capability to handle complex wage and hour disputes. The…

Read More

Supreme Court Limits Private Enforcement of Investment Company Act, Entrusting SEC with Authority

In a decision that will undoubtedly shape the landscape of investor protection, the Supreme Court ruled against private investors seeking to use legal recourse against investment companies for contract violations. The case, FS Credit Opportunities Corp. v. Saba Capital Master Fund, brought to the forefront the issue of who has the right to enforce the…

Read More

Supreme Court Blocks Alabama’s Nitrogen Execution Plan, Citing Constitutional Concerns

Court Considers Nitrogen Gas Execution The United States Supreme Court recently declined Alabama’s request to proceed with the execution of Jeffery Lee using nitrogen hypoxia, sparking significant legal discourse on the constitutionality of this execution method. The case has become a point of contention, shedding light on the evolving legal landscape surrounding capital punishment. The…

Read More

Private Judging Revolutionizes Family Law: A Streamlined, Discreet Alternative to Overburdened Courts

The landscape of family law is experiencing a significant shift as private judging emerges as a favored alternative to traditional court proceedings. This trend is fueled by the limitations of public courts, which often grapple with overwhelming caseloads and lengthy delays. In contrast, private judging offers a more flexible, efficient resolution process, appealing to many…

Read More

Miss America Bankruptcy Case Intensifies as CEO Seeks Court to Bar Former Counsel

The ongoing legal saga involving the Miss America Organization has taken a new turn, as its CEO recently petitioned a Florida federal court to exclude their former counsel, Carlton Fields, from participating in a status conference related to the pageant’s bankruptcy case. The request underscores the complicated dynamics of representation in high-stakes bankruptcy litigation. According…

Read More

Meta Faces Legal Challenge Over AI Model Training in Copyright Dispute with Film Studio

In a significant legal development, Meta Platforms Inc. is facing a lawsuit from a pornographic film studio over alleged copyright infringement. The studio accuses Meta of downloading its films to train generative artificial intelligence models. A federal judge in California has rejected Meta’s attempt to dismiss the case, stating that the studio has presented sufficient…

Read More

Court Criticizes Simplified Jury Forms in Patent Trials, Advocates for Detailed Verdicts

In a recent decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit criticized the methodology employed by U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, specifically his use of simplified jury verdict forms during patent infringement trials. These forms consolidate multiple infringement allegations into a straightforward “yes” or “no” answer. This approach, according to the court, compromises…

Read More

OpenAI Leverages Supreme Court Ruling to Challenge News Organizations’ Copyright Claims in AI Training Dispute

In a significant development, OpenAI has argued that the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision in Cox v. Sony has curtailed certain intellectual property claims made by news organizations. OpenAI presented this argument to a New York federal judge, contending that the ruling undermines the contributory infringement claims brought by four news companies. These companies have…

Read More