Eden Foods vs. Eden Holistics: Trademark Battle Highlights Challenges in CBD and Organic Food Sectors

In a recent development, organic food producer Eden Foods has initiated legal action against Eden Holistics in a Nevada federal court. Allegations against the CBD company include violating a settlement agreement that stemmed from a prior trademark dispute. The agreement demanded that Eden Holistics cease using the “Eden” name in association with consumable goods, a…

Read More

Colorado Roofing Firm Faces $650,000 Claim Over Unpaid Legal Fees in Trademark Dispute

In a recent development, Akerman LLP has filed a claim in a Colorado state court, asserting that a roofing company owes nearly $650,000 in unpaid attorney fees and costs related to a trademark infringement lawsuit. This legal battle, originally initiated by a competing Nevada business, highlights ongoing tensions in the construction industry over intellectual property…

Read More

Federal Judge’s Ruling in Philadelphia Wine School Trademark Dispute Highlights Challenges in Brand Protection

A recent decision by a Pennsylvania federal judge has reignited the discussion around trademark disputes, particularly in the realm of local business branding. The ruling stemmed from a legal battle between two wine education businesses in Philadelphia, where the incumbent company, Wine School of Philadelphia, sought an injunction against the newer Philly Wine School, arguing…

Read More

Trademark Conflict in D.C. as Local Newspaper Challenges NOTUS’s Rebrand to “The Star”

A Washington, D.C.-based newspaper has initiated legal action against digital media company NOTUS, challenging its forthcoming rebranding as “The Star.” The lawsuit, filed in a Virginia federal court on Thursday, asserts that the newspaper holds a trademark for “The Star” in the context of news reporting within the D.C. area. NOTUS, established in 2023 by…

Read More

USPTO Encourages Detailed Declarations to Navigate Patent Eligibility Challenges

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is increasingly suggesting that applicants furnish detailed declarations to clarify why their inventions should not be categorized merely as abstract ideas or natural phenomena. This approach stems from a broader effort to refine and streamline patent evaluations, a move that is being closely observed by attorneys and patent…

Read More

Walmart Seeks to Dismiss Estée Lauder’s Lawsuit Due to Lack of Specificity in Infringement Claims

In a recent legal battle, Walmart has urged a California federal judge to dismiss most of Estée Lauder’s lawsuit, which accuses the retail giant of selling infringing beauty products online. Walmart argues that the complaint lacks specificity, describing it as “vague and ambiguous” regarding which products, sellers, and listings are involved, as well as the…

Read More

USPTO Director Squires Selectively Advances Inter Partes Review Petitions Amid Patent Dispute Evolution

In his latest round of decisions, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Director John Squires has moved forward with three petitions for inter partes review (IPR), marking a significant step in the ongoing evolution of patent disputes. These decisions come as part of Squires’ latest bulk order, highlighting the ongoing strategic shift in handling complex intellectual…

Read More

Supreme Court Faces Crucial Challenges in Patent Disputes with Dolby, AT&T, and USPTO

The U.S. Supreme Court has been approached with important objections to three separate patent petitions, showcasing the dynamic nature of intellectual property disputes. On Tuesday, Unified Patents filed objections against Dolby Laboratories’ attempt to appeal a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) decision, which had previously been in Unified’s favor. Dolby’s challenge to this decision…

Read More

Shifting Standards at PTAB Raise Concerns Over Patent System’s Stability and Predictability

Recent developments at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) have been causing concern among legal professionals dealing with patent litigation, particularly due to Director John Squires’ approach. The institution rate at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) under Squires has sunk to unprecedented lows, raising alarms over the predictability and stability of the…

Read More

Court Ruling Limits Copyright Protection for Fitness Routines, Impacting Industry Practices

In a pivotal decision, a federal court recently ruled against copyright protection for a popular fitness routine known as the “Anderson Method.” This case has brought significant attention to the limitations of copyright law within the fitness industry. According to the court, the method, while effective and popular among enthusiasts, does not qualify for copyright…

Read More

Gucci Secures Legal Victory in Trademark Case, Highlights Ongoing Battle Against Counterfeits

Gucci America Inc. recently reached a confidential settlement with two companies it accused of trademark infringement over the sale of counterfeit perfumes. This legal development culminated with a Michigan federal judge issuing a permanent injunction on Friday, halting any future infringements from the defendants. The case highlights ongoing challenges luxury brands face in protecting their…

Read More

USPTO Urges Supreme Court to Deny Dolby’s Appeal Amid Policy Shift Towards Greater Transparency

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has advised the Supreme Court to deny Dolby Laboratories’ request for an appeal that would compel Unified Patents to disclose the interested parties involved in a patent challenge. The USPTO argues that Dolby lacks the legal standing necessary for the case to proceed. Furthermore, a recent policy revision…

Read More

Government Urges Supreme Court to Avoid Missteps in PepsiCo Trademark Case

Recently, the federal government expressed its stance regarding a trademark dispute between PepsiCo and Rise Brewing Co., a maker of nitro cold-brew coffee. Despite acknowledging that the Second Circuit made errors in its analysis, the government advised the U.S. Supreme Court to abstain from reviewing the case. This unusual recommendation arises from considerations over the…

Read More

Top 5 Intellectual Property Podcasts for Legal Experts: Staying Informed in a Dynamic Field

As intellectual property attorneys juggle multiple cases and complex legal frameworks, staying informed about the latest trends and developments is crucial. For those looking to combine learning with leisure, a range of podcasts can offer both education and entertainment. Here are five podcasts that stand out for IP professionals. IP Fridays provides insights into both…

Read More

Ninth Circuit Examines Implications of Trademark Parody in Jack Daniel’s “Bad Spaniels” Case

The Ninth Circuit recently probed the legitimacy of a trademark victory claimed by Jack Daniel’s regarding VIP Products’ “Bad Spaniels” dog toy. This case challenges whether Jack Daniel’s distinctive design elements, apart from its name, can support a tarnishment ruling against the product, famously styled as a poop-themed parody of the renowned whiskey brand. During…

Read More

USPTO Redefines Role of Generative AI in Patent Process: Human Inventors Remain Key

In a significant shift within intellectual property law, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently altered its stance on generative AI in the patent process. In November 2025, the USPTO rescinded its previous guidance on AI-assisted inventorship, categorizing generative AI as a tool akin to laboratory equipment or computer software. This move reconceptualizes AI…

Read More

USPTO’s Latest Patent Decisions Reflect Ongoing Challenges in Innovation Protection

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), under the direction of John Squires, has recently approved five patent reviews while rejecting seven other petitions, a decision impacting stakeholders across various industries. This decision came under the governance of the America Invents Act of 2011, which reshaped the U.S. patent system to accommodate a more modern…

Read More

Silicon Valley Chipmaker Groq Reaches Settlement in Trademark Dispute with Endocrinologist

Silicon Valley chipmaker Groq has resolved a trademark infringement dispute with an endocrinologist over the contested ‘Groq Health’ trademark. The case, which was filed in a New York federal court, saw Groq challenge the use of a similar business name by the doctor, leading to concerns over potential consumer confusion regarding brand identity and services…

Read More