A Virginia political candidate and former contestant on the reality show “FBoy Island” is embroiled in a legal dispute following his ban from the prediction market platform Kalshi. The candidate, a lawyer by profession, argues in a recently filed lawsuit that his actions on Kalshi were not an endorsement of political candidate trading but rather…
In the rapidly evolving legal landscape, staying abreast of the latest news is crucial for legal professionals. A recent roundup on Law360 highlighted some of the top firms and stories making waves last week. Readers keen on legal developments can explore insightful analyses and current affairs shaping the industry. Law360’s comprehensive coverage extends to over…
The legal battle involving Sam Smith and Normani over their 2019 hit “Dancing With a Stranger” remains unresolved as a California federal judge expressed skepticism about dismissing a copyright infringement suit against the pair. This suit accuses the artists of allegedly copying elements from another song. Despite the Ninth Circuit’s revival of the case, legal…
The recent deportation of an Afghan woman accused of planning an ISIS-inspired mass shooting marks a significant judicial moment as it represents the first case to be heard by the Alien Terrorist Removal Court since its establishment in 1996. This rare judicial process was activated when the Trump administration sought to remove the woman under…
In a recent ruling by the Ninth Circuit, a group of class action attorneys must arbitrate their grievances regarding a sanctions order against them before they can contest it in court. The attorneys had previously filed a lawsuit against Walmart Inc., alleging misleading information related to an $8 bottle of avocado oil. However, their claims…
The Washington State Commission on Judicial Conduct has censured former Okanogan County Superior Court Commissioner Robert Colbert for engaging in communications with a court employee that included sexually explicit language. The Commission determined that Colbert’s actions violated the Code of Judicial Conduct, which mandates that judges uphold the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary and…
The recent settlement between T-Mobile and Kaifi LLC underscores the nuances and potential pitfalls associated with the wording of settlement agreements, especially concerning ex parte reexaminations (EPRs). The case revolves around T-Mobile’s strategic use of a contingency payment to finalize litigation, shedding light on the challenges faced by alleged infringers when contesting patents through the…
In a significant move toward modernizing intellectual property administration, the U.S. Copyright Office is set to pilot a new registration system by late 2026. The initiative marks a critical step in overhauling the current systems to enhance efficiency and accessibility for stakeholders in the creative industries. This forthcoming system aims to streamline the registration process,…
Verizon has decided to withdraw its lawsuit against T-Mobile that accused the rival carrier of misrepresenting potential customer savings through its advertisements. This legal battle had been ongoing in a New York federal court, where Verizon claimed that T-Mobile’s promotional material exaggerated the cost benefits of switching providers, suggesting over $1,000 in savings annually. Earlier…
In a recent decision, a federal judge in California refused Walmart’s attempt to dismiss a lawsuit brought by Estee Lauder Companies Inc. The suit alleges that Walmart sold unauthorized replicas of Estee Lauder’s beauty products through its online platform, casting a spotlight on the complexities of trademark law in the digital retail space. More details…
A patent-holding company has petitioned a Texas federal judge for a new infringement trial against DoorDash, alleging that the food delivery company’s conduct resulted in “prejudicial errors.” The request also seeks a favorable judgment on the enablement defense. In July 2026, a jury in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas found…
In a recent ruling, a patent-holding entity has been mandated to pay approximately $821,000 in attorney fees and costs to eHarmony and The Meet Group. This financial obligation follows unsuccessful patent infringement lawsuits, which were challenged under the U.S. Supreme Court’s Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International decision. The Alice test, which determines the patent…
A Colorado sod company is moving to impose sanctions against opposing counsel as part of an ongoing trade secrets litigation. This maneuver is seen by the defendants as an attempt to revisit previous discovery disputes. The case involves allegations that former employees and rival businesses misappropriated trade secrets, prompting the company to seek legal recourse….
Colorado Governor Jared Polis has made a significant appointment to the Denver District Court. On Friday, Gov. Polis announced the appointment of an attorney to fill the vacancy that will result from an upcoming retirement on the bench. This move is part of the governor’s ongoing efforts to ensure a robust and well-resourced judicial system…
In a notable decision, a divided panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a lower court’s ruling favoring Amazon, absolving the tech giant from claims of patent infringement against AlterWAN Inc. The case centered around a network patent, the validity and interpretation of which have been hotly contested. The majority…
The Federal Circuit recently affirmed a Pennsylvania federal judge’s ruling, confirming that Globus Medical Inc. did not infringe on the spinal surgery tool patents held by Moskowitz Family LLC. The decision underscored the significance of patent language, specifically how the opening statements, or preambles, can narrow the scope of patent claims. This legal interpretation was…
A recent hearing at the Federal Circuit has spotlighted a legal confrontation involving a medical training startup and Galderma, a pharmaceutical company. The startup accuses Galderma of employing a “classic catch-and-kill strategy” to sabotage a prospective $100 million deal with Allergan. The details emerged as the startup pushed for the revival of claims linked to…
The increasing threat of cyberattacks against the legal industry has prompted a call for enhanced education on artificial intelligence for legal professionals. The American Bar Association’s Cybersecurity Legal Task Force is making strides in this area, aiming to equip lawyers with the knowledge necessary to safeguard clients’ data and leverage AI tools effectively. As highlighted…
Altria Group Inc., the parent company of Philip Morris, has signaled its intent to appeal a ruling by a North Carolina federal judge regarding a sublicensing agreement between R.J. Reynolds Vapor Co. and Juul Labs Inc. This decision, as reported by Law360, exempts R.J. Reynolds from paying continued royalties under a 2022 jury verdict. The…
A recent decision by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) presents significant implications for trademark registrations in the context of law firms, particularly those providing niche legal services. The TTAB ruled against a former associate who attempted to register “Birth Justice” as a trademark for birth-injury legal services. This associate had developed these services…
Tom Goldstein, a prominent appellate lawyer, delivered a robust challenge to overturn his felony fraud convictions, arguing before the Fourth Circuit that significant trial errors irreparably harmed his defense. Goldstein asserted that prosecutors pursued a conviction with unwavering determination, disregarding both facts and legal standards. He emphasized that the trial was marred by the testimony…
A recent ruling by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board has highlighted the complexities surrounding intellectual property rights in the legal sector. A former associate of a personal injury and medical malpractice firm was unsuccessful in her attempt to register the trademark “Birth Justice” for birth-injury legal services. She developed the concept during her tenure…
The aftermath of September 11, 2001, ushered in significant changes across various sectors in New York, and the real estate strategies of law firms were no exception. Prior to the attacks, many law firms, including Sidley Austin LLP, were strategically embedded within the financial district, often occupying landmark buildings that defined the city’s skyline. However,…
The recent proxy season has highlighted a growing clash between conservative investor groups and corporate policies on transgender care. Despite efforts by these groups to advance shareholder proposals aimed at limiting transgender care coverage for minors, particularly during the 2025–2026 proxy season, their initiatives have faced significant setbacks. Notably, all six proposals were met with…
With the midterm elections approaching, speculation is mounting over whether the Democrats will regain control of one or both chambers of Congress. If successful, such a shift could significantly impact ongoing investigations into transactions between major law firms and the Trump administration. These deals, involving nine prominent law firms, have drawn attention for their scope…