Donald Trump’s legal team has filed an appeal to New York’s highest court, urging a review of what they label an “unprecedented” fraud conviction. The appeal, submitted by attorneys from Sullivan & Cromwell, argues for the necessity of revisiting the case following revelations from Michael Cohen, Trump’s former attorney, who recently stated he felt “coerced”…
In a recent legal development, a Colorado-based bankruptcy attorney’s legal battle against tech giant Google has come to a close. A state judge granted the attorney’s request to dismiss his own lawsuit, which accused Google of inexplicably removing his firm’s business profile. This dismissal marks the end of an assertion that had, at its core,…
A recent ruling by a federal judge has halted Louisiana’s efforts to enforce stricter rules on the abortion pill mifepristone, following a decision to stay the case while the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) completes a safety review. This development is part of the ongoing debate over abortion rights and medication access in the United…
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently upheld a decision from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB), which dismissed a challenge against a trademark application filed by a vape company. The court affirmed that there was no likelihood of confusion between the disputed mark and an existing one, thereby allowing…
The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled in favor of Google, allowing the transfer of an antitrust case from Texas to a California court. The decision, penned by Judge James Ho and joined by Judge Catharina Haynes, emphasized the importance of logistical considerations over speed, taking into account that the majority of witnesses…
Ohio’s Secretary of State Frank LaRose and county election officials have appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court in a complex election dispute concerning political speech. The case involves Sam Ronan, a candidate for Ohio’s 15th congressional district in the Republican primary, removed from the ballot after a protest questioned his Republican affiliation. His candidacy was…
The U.S. Supreme Court’s approach to certain civil rights cases continues to be a focus of intense scrutiny. Recent decisions have reignited concerns over the Court’s tendency to issue summary reversals, particularly in the realm of qualified immunity and habeas corpus. In the Zorn v. Linton case, the Supreme Court summarily reversed a decision by…
As Illinois’ longest-serving House Speaker, Michael Madigan, faces a pivotal legal battle in the US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, the ramifications of this case are poised to reverberate throughout the state’s already tumultuous political landscape. Madigan, a dominant figure in Illinois politics for decades, is embroiled in a complex legal saga that…
The developments in the United States Supreme Court continue to draw significant attention, with multiple issues taking center stage on Wednesday, April 8. This week marks the fourth anniversary since Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson was confirmed to the Supreme Court, commemorating her historic confirmation as the first Black woman to serve as a justice on…
In a notable development concerning legal disputes over compensation, a Texas appeals court has maintained the momentum of a lawsuit filed by the former general counsel of a dairy equipment manufacturer regarding unpaid bonuses. This decision underscores the evolving landscape of employment litigation, particularly with the application of anti-SLAPP laws. The court held that updated…
In a pivotal decision, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the online publication of the American Society for Testing and Materials’ (ASTM) copyrighted technical standards falls under fair use, thus not infringing upon copyright protections. This decision carries significant implications for the public’s access to essential building codes and other standards integral to…
The Federal Circuit has decided against revisiting a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) ruling regarding a contested patent amendment from Digital Turbine Inc. The appeal, pushed by competitor ironSource Ltd., was dismissed on the basis that ironSource lacked the necessary standing to challenge the decision in court, as reported by Law360. This ruling emphasizes…
In a noteworthy development, the Georgia Court of Appeals has recently vacated approximately $662,000 in interest linked to a $2 million arbitration award in a dispute between two medical device companies. This decision highlights a critical focus on the accuracy of interest calculations in arbitration awards. The panel acknowledged that while imposing interest was justified,…
The US Supreme Court has vacated an appellate ruling that upheld Steve Bannon’s contempt of Congress conviction, allowing the Department of Justice (DOJ) to move towards dismissing criminal charges against the former White House strategist. This decision remands the case back to the Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit for additional consideration based on…
In a pivotal decision delivered by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, the intricacies of trade secret misappropriation damages came under scrutiny. The court affirmed a district court’s decision to vacate a substantial $75 million jury verdict in the case of Trinseo Europe GmbH v. Kellogg Brown & Root LLC. This ruling…
A US federal appellate court recently issued a decision that the New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement (NJDGE) cannot enforce state sports-betting laws against the financial services company Kalshi while ongoing litigation unfolds. This ruling provides Kalshi, a prediction market facilitator, with the interim ability to continue offering its event contract trading platform, despite legal…
Judge Ralph Erickson, a distinguished figure in the U.S. judicial system, is set to take senior status on the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. This transition is especially noteworthy considering his substantial impact on the court since his elevation in 2017 by then-President Donald Trump. Erickson’s judicial journey has been characterized by his significant contributions…
Artificial intelligence has been making waves across numerous sectors, and the judicial system might be the next to experience significant transformation. Shlomo Klapper, the founder and CEO of Learned Hand, is steering this shift by advancing AI-driven tools specifically for use in courtrooms. Klapper, whose experience includes litigation at Quinn Emanuel and clerking at the…
Gun control in the United States remains a contentious issue that continues to shape both political and legal landscapes. The Supreme Court has increasingly turned its attention to clarifying key elements within the Second Amendment. The evolving interpretations focus on three main issues: who is allowed to possess firearms, what firearms can be owned, and…
The Trump administration’s recent attempt to reinstate executive orders that revoke the security clearances of several prominent law firms could significantly impact arbitration practices in the United States. The College of Commercial Arbitrators is advocating for the D.C. Circuit to reject these federal appeals, arguing that the administration’s actions could threaten the foundation of U.S….
In a significant affirmation of judicial accountability, the Wisconsin Court of Appeals upheld the conviction of former Milwaukee County Judge John Doe. The judicial panel confirmed that Doe misused his position to assist an undocumented immigrant in evading ICE detention, raising critical questions about the intersection of judicial conduct and immigration policy. The decision came…
In a pivotal decision for the intersection of federal and state regulation, the US Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit has determined that New Jersey cannot impose state laws on sports bets placed on prediction markets. This decision reinforces the exclusive jurisdiction of the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) over designated contract markets…
The 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals has issued a landmark ruling in favor of Kalshi Inc., effectively exempting its sports contracts from New Jersey’s stringent gambling laws. In a 2-1 decision, the court affirmed that Kalshi’s event contracts align with the Commodity Exchange Act’s definition of “swaps,” and as such, fall under the jurisdiction of…
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit recently affirmed a decision by the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri, holding steady on a $5.8 million attorney fee award related to a legal battle involving Jet Midwest. The appellate court confirmed that the district court had acted correctly in rejecting the…
Kalshi Inc., a prediction market platform, has successfully navigated a significant legal challenge, securing a victory in a dispute with New Jersey regulators. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit ruled in favor of Kalshi, allowing the company to operate without falling under the state’s regulatory umbrella. This decision represents a substantial affirmation…