The Supreme Court has dismissed a case previously slated for argument in October concerning the rights of noncitizens to a bond hearing during extended detentions. This decision follows confirmation from U.S. Solicitor General D. John Sauer that the matter had become moot, a position shared by the challenger’s legal team. The case, known as Genalo…
In a notable decision, a divided panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a lower court’s ruling favoring Amazon, absolving the tech giant from claims of patent infringement against AlterWAN Inc. The case centered around a network patent, the validity and interpretation of which have been hotly contested. The majority…
A recent decision from the DC Circuit’s Court of Appeals has set a critical precedent by invalidating the Trump administration’s directive to extend the operation of coal plants beyond their scheduled closure dates. This decision specifically targeted the J.H. Campbell Generating Plant in Michigan, which had been kept operational through a series of emergency declarations…
In a pivotal decision from the Ninth Circuit, a jury instruction has led to the reversal of a $40 million verdict in a trade secret case, spotlighting the proof burdens faced by plaintiffs in such litigation. The ruling underscores the critical importance of jury instructions and the precise requirements for establishing a trade secret claim….
A federal appeals court in Boston has declined the Trump administration’s request to lift an injunction that blocks the U.S. Postal Service from implementing a controversial rule restricting mail-in ballots. This decision, made on Thursday, affirms an earlier ruling by U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani. The ruling prevents the Postal Service from executing key parts…
As the 25th anniversary of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks approaches, the U.S. Supreme Court is once again poised to grapple with the legal ramifications that have echoed over the past two decades. Since May, three petitions linked to the 9/11 attacks have been submitted for the Court’s review. Two revolve around the federal…
In a recent legal development, a California state appeals court has determined that Jay-Z’s claims against Texas attorney Tony Buzbee will not be revived. The case, involving allegations of defamation and extortion connected to a sexual abuse suit against Sean “Diddy” Combs, was dismissed under California’s anti-SLAPP statute, aimed at protecting free speech. The court’s…
Apple Inc. has petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to review a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which upheld the International Trade Commission’s (ITC) finding that certain Apple Watch models infringed patents held by Masimo Corporation. Apple contends that the Federal Circuit improperly lowered the threshold for establishing a domestic…
A recent legal decision has favored LinkedIn in a pair of lawsuits concerning its practice of scanning browser extensions used by its users. A federal judge in California dismissed the cases, finding that the plaintiffs failed to establish the necessary standing to sue. The ruling came from Judge Vince Chhabria at the US District Court…
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently addressed a legal challenge against the NCAA’s five-year eligibility rule, which limits how long student-athletes can participate in college sports. This rule was initially blocked by a Nevada federal judge, who sided with a college baseball player challenging it. The player argued that the rule restricted his ability…
The Trump administration has petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to address the legality surrounding the appointment of acting U.S. attorneys, particularly focusing on Nevada, where the appointment of Sigal Chattah has come under judicial scrutiny. A ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit determined that Chattah was ineligible to serve as…
In a pointed appeal to Singapore’s authorities, Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, and CIVICUS have implored the government to drop charges against a group of activists facing prosecution for their involvement in peaceful assemblies. These gatherings were designed to advocate for the rights of Palestinians in Gaza and to challenge the city-state’s use of the…
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has affirmed that Roblox Corporation waived its right to compel arbitration in a class-action lawsuit concerning child safety on its platform. The court determined that Roblox’s extensive engagement in litigation before invoking the arbitration clause constituted a waiver of that right. The lawsuit was initiated by a father alleging…
As SCOTUSblog enters a new era, legal professionals closely monitor ongoing and new cases that the U.S. Supreme Court considers. Recent developments have drawn attention to the decades-old Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA), with the Supreme Court being asked to evaluate its provisions in relation to religious land use protections. One notable…
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has determined that the appeals put forth by the NCAA concerning injunctions against its five-year rule are moot. This decision was reached after the realization that the collegiate football season for which the rule was contested has ended, and the players involved have completed their college careers. This effectively…
The Third Circuit Court of Appeals has declined to revisit its prior decision to uphold a New Jersey district court’s dismissal of an antitrust lawsuit involving Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. The case centered around allegations that the pharmaceutical company engaged in a pay-for-delay scheme to postpone the introduction of a generic version of Lipitor, a best-selling…
As financial powerhouses increasingly set their sights on Texas, local regulatory and enforcement bodies are bolstering their ranks to manage the challenges that accompany such growth. The Texas State Securities Board and the Texas Department of Banking are two such entities stepping up efforts to ensure they are well-equipped to handle the influx of firms…
A coalition of 22 states, spearheaded by California, alongside the District of Columbia, has urged the Supreme Court to preserve a federal judge’s decision that stops the Trump administration from enforcing certain provisions of a U.S. Postal Service rule concerning mail-in ballots. The legal entanglement originated from an executive order signed by President Donald Trump…
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals recently overturned a $124 million verdict due to undisclosed ties between the magistrate judge and the plaintiff’s attorney. This decision highlights the critical importance of transparency in judicial proceedings and raises questions about impartiality in the legal system. According to recent reports, the judge failed to disclose a friendship…
Amgen is appealing to the Fourth Circuit Court to dismiss CareFirst’s lawsuit, asserting the case’s lack of merit due to court orders enforcing its patents on the rheumatoid arthritis drug Enbrel. This action follows a decision by a Virginia federal judge who refused to dismiss the lawsuit, which accuses Amgen of unlawfully delaying the entry…
Warner Bros. Television is embroiled in a legal dispute over allegations that its popular medical drama “The Pitt” unlawfully copied elements from the iconic series “ER.” On Tuesday, the studio urged a California appellate panel to overturn a lower court’s decision not to dismiss the lawsuit filed by Sherri Crichton, widow of the “ER” creator…
In a notable decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently reiterated the standards surrounding prior art in patent disputes. The case, Dental Monitoring SAS v. Align Technology Inc., highlights the importance of clear prior art definitions in the context of dental technology patents. The court’s ruling from August 10, 2026, emphasizes…
In a significant development within intellectual property litigation, defendants in “Schedule A” cases are employing a novel strategy to challenge numerous default judgments previously entered against them. This approach has been described by legal experts as “basically unprecedented,” highlighting its rarity and potential impact on the legal landscape. “Schedule A” litigation involves rights holders filing…
The recent decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit marks a notable development in the ongoing legal saga between Viavi Solutions Inc. and a competitor. In a ruling on Tuesday, the Court upheld a lower court’s decision requiring Viavi to cover the attorney fees of a rival company. Viavi had previously…
In a recent development at the intersection of electoral law and federal authority, the Trump administration has appealed to the Supreme Court to address its concerns over election fraud. The administration aims to implement a program designed to verify voters’ citizenship using the Department of Homeland Security’s Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) database. This…