In a significant development from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, questions have been raised regarding the validity of a court order affected by artificial intelligence errors. The controversy centers on a district court’s decision to block a Mississippi law targeting diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, which allegedly included fabricated citations….
A recent ruling by a California federal judge has provided Meta Platforms Inc. a temporary reprieve in an antitrust lawsuit filed by a UK-based company. The British firm accused Meta of appropriating its concept for Instagram’s shopping feature. The judge determined that the claims were filed too late, as the alleged infringement occurred years prior…
A recent appeal before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has spotlighted significant concerns for patent owners regarding the marking of patented products. A patent licensing entity is challenging a ruling that imposes a requirement on patent owners to ensure licensees mark their products with patent information to secure presuit damages. This…
The U.S. Supreme Court has paved the way for the construction of a contentious ballroom at the White House, over opposition from historic preservation groups. In a closely divided 5-4 decision, the court dismissed an appeal by the National Trust for Historic Preservation (NTHP), ruling that the organization lacked the standing to challenge the project,…
In a notable development within the legal landscape, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decided not to revisit a case involving allegations of price discrimination against the maker of Clear Eyes drops, despite dissent from two judges. This decision allows the previous ruling to stand, which favored the wholesalers who accused the…
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently affirmed that MSN Laboratories’ efforts to introduce a generic version of the cancer treatment Cabometyx, developed by Exelixis, will be on hold. This decision comes after the court rejected MSN’s challenge against the validity of three patents held by Exelixis on the drug. The ruling…
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has determined that Nevada has the authority to regulate Kalshi Inc.’s sports event contracts as gambling, diverging from a previous ruling by a sister circuit and creating a significant circuit split. The court found that these contracts are essentially bets and not swaps, which fall under…
In a pivotal move within the ongoing litigation landscape, William Ramey of Ramey LLP has petitioned the full Federal Circuit to reevaluate a significant sanction order. Ramey is challenging his responsibility for over $207,000 in penalties tied to a patent infringement lawsuit involving his client and Volkswagen. The central argument revolves around whether his defective…
Push is coming to shove as two Republican groups, the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) and the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC), have taken their plea to the highest court over a decision impacting broadcasting rates for political ads. The groups have approached the Supreme Court with an emergency application seeking to halt a ruling…
In a recent decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit expressed significant concerns regarding a former partner at Benesch Friedlander Coplan & Aronoff LLP and their handling of a client’s trade secrets lawsuit. The attorney in question chose to represent a trade secrets suit client while simultaneously negotiating employment with the opposing…
In a notable decision, the US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit has determined that Kalshi’s attempt to sidestep Nevada’s gambling laws by branding its sports bets as “swaps” under federal law does not hold water. This ruling marks a significant moment for prediction markets, particularly in the context of differing regulatory landscapes across…
Amid ongoing legal battles surrounding the opioid crisis, pharmacy benefit managers OptumRx and Express Scripts have petitioned the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. Their appeal seeks to reverse U.S. District Judge Dan Polster’s July 27 order, which opened the doors for 800 plaintiffs to sue them. The case highlights the increasingly complex…
The Federal Circuit recently transferred T-Mobile’s appeal regarding a patent litigation settlement to the Fifth Circuit. This decision emerged from a case initially handled by the Eastern District of Texas, which had jurisdiction when the appeal was lodged. The case exemplifies the often complex interplay between district and appellate jurisdictions in patent disputes, a dynamic…
In July 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit delivered a significant ruling in Wyeth LLC v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, affirming the invalidation of Wyeth’s patent claims for lack of enablement. This decision underscores the stringent requirements for patent specifications, particularly in the realm of pharmaceutical treatments. Wyeth’s patents, U.S. Patent Nos….
In a recent decision that will resonate with retailers across the nation, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit opted to uphold a Texas federal court ruling dismissing claims against Bath & Body Works and The Buckle. The litigation accused these retailers of infringing on an e-commerce patent. The Federal Circuit’s decision, handed…
The Trump administration has petitioned the Supreme Court to assess the constitutional validity of a ban on transgender military personnel, implemented by an executive order from President Trump shortly after his second inauguration. This executive order directed the Department of Defense to establish a policy disqualifying individuals with gender dysphoria from military service. The rationale…
The Third Circuit Court of Appeals recently delivered a significant ruling that challenges the previous administration’s stance on immigrant mandatory detention. The court rejected the argument that certain noncitizens must face mandatory detention without bond hearings, a policy that was vigorously defended during Donald Trump’s presidency. This development highlights ongoing judicial scrutiny of immigration policies…
In a significant ruling for the betting industry, a U.S. appeals court has determined that sports wagers do not qualify as swaps under current financial regulations. This decision deals a blow to Kalshi, a platform that has sought to integrate financial market mechanisms into the realm of sports betting. The court’s opinion directly impacts how…
In a recent ruling, Judge Myong J. Joun of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts issued a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) against the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). This order effectively blocks HUD’s attempt to cease funding for the Private Enforcement Initiatives (PEI) under the Fair Housing Act by…
In recent developments, several significant legal and corporate events have unfolded, impacting various sectors and raising important considerations for corporate legal professionals. In a notable case concerning press freedom and military oversight, three staff members from the independent military news outlet Stars and Stripes have filed a federal lawsuit against Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth…
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has declined to adopt the “server test,” a legal standard that assesses copyright liability based on the physical location of online content storage. This decision diverges from the Ninth Circuit’s approach, which has traditionally relied on the server test to determine whether embedding content from…
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has classified a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) order concerning a radiation monitoring patent as “informative,” emphasizing the decision’s broader implications for similar cases. This move marks the USPTO’s recognition of orders that can guide both the patent office and broader legal community in complex patent issues,…
In recent years, the U.S. Supreme Court’s emergency docket has received considerable attention, shaping significant aspects of constitutional law and affecting high-stakes cases abruptly. This docket often involves rulings on cases without full briefings or oral arguments, which raises important discussions about transparency and procedural fairness. Yet, while much of the scrutiny remains fixed on…
In a significant legal maneuver, Republican campaign committees are seeking intervention from the Supreme Court to reduce election commercial prices on broadcast TV stations. This request follows a decision from a panel at the US Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit, which ruled against a previous order by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). This…
In a series of decisions issued on August 27, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit delivered setbacks to Apple Inc. in its ongoing patent disputes with Smart Mobile Technologies LLC. The court declined to revive Apple’s challenges to certain patent claims and overturned the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (PTAB) invalidation…