Federal Circuit Affirms PTAB Ruling, Reinvigorating Patent Claim Standards in Tech Sector

The Federal Circuit recently upheld a ruling by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), affirming the invalidity of claims within a contested video-decoding patent. This decision came after the patent holder argued against the restrictions on presenting written description support during the proceedings. This verdict impacts the domain of intellectual property, reinforcing the standards…

Read More

USPTO Launches Pilot Program to Streamline Patent Examination Amid Backlog Concerns

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has announced a pilot program that hopes to streamline the patent examination process, addressing long-standing concerns over examination backlogs. The program, revealed on April 10, 2026, introduces a new requirement for certain applicants in the national stage to actively request the examination of their patent applications, a move…

Read More

U.S. Federal Circuit Upholds Microsoft’s Victory in Mobile Architecture Patent Case

In a significant decision for intellectual property and technology law, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (PTAB) ruling, affirming that Microsoft Corporation successfully demonstrated the invalidity of claims from Lemko Corp.’s distributed mobile architecture patent. This comes as an important development in the ongoing interplay…

Read More

Federal Circuit’s Approach to Trade Secret Law Signals Significant Shift in Intellectual Property Strategy

The Federal Circuit’s evolving view of trade secrets represents a significant shift in the landscape of intellectual property law. Traditionally governed by common law and the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA), as adopted by individual states, trade secret law saw a change with the introduction of the federal Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA) in 2016….

Read More

Federal Circuit Affirms PTAB’s Rejection of Sentient Sensors Patent Claims, Emphasizes Stringent Innovation Standards

The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently decided to uphold the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (PTAB) conclusion that claims associated with a Sentient Sensors monitoring patent lacked innovation and were therefore deemed obvious. The case revolved around patent claims concerning technology employed in military instrument monitoring systems. The Federal Circuit’s…

Read More

Federal Circuit Upholds PTAB Ruling Against Remote-Control Patents, Favoring Roku in Streaming Tech Dispute

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently upheld a decision by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), which invalidated certain patent claims related to remote-control technology asserted against Roku Inc. The affirmation on Friday further cements Roku’s legal standing in a protracted battle over the intellectual property rights associated with its…

Read More

Blank Rome Strengthens Intellectual Property Practice with Key Patent Lawyer Hires in Chicago and Dallas

Blank Rome LLP, a prominent law firm known for its comprehensive legal services, has strategically expanded its patent practice by hiring two seasoned patent lawyers in Chicago and Dallas. This move signals the firm’s focus on enhancing its intellectual property capabilities across different regions. In Chicago, Blank Rome has welcomed Edward Chadwick, formerly of Troutman…

Read More

Federal Circuit’s Deliberation on Patent Marking Could Reshape Intellectual Property Law

In a recent development that could pave the way for legal clarity, the Federal Circuit’s Chief Judge indicated the potential for establishing a clear precedent concerning the role of patent marking in admissionless settlements. This statement emerged during a hearing where attorney William Ramey faced criticism from a Federal Circuit panel over his conduct in…

Read More

Federal Circuit Chief Judge Advocates for Clearer IP Marking Standards Amid Patent Litigation Criticisms

Amidst recent legal proceedings involving patent litigation, the Chief Judge of the Federal Circuit has articulated the potential necessity for a clear standard concerning the marking of intellectual property rights. The remarks were made during a session where the panel criticized attorney William Ramey for his conduct in a failed 3D glasses patent case against…

Read More

Patco Brands Challenges BuzzBallz in Federal Court Over Domain Dispute, Alleging Anticompetitive Cybersquatting

In a recent legal development, Patco Brands has contested BuzzBallz’s acquisition of web domains associated with Patco’s forthcoming products, labeling the move as both unfunny and unlawful. BuzzBallz, a producer of ready-to-drink cocktails, had previously claimed that the purchase was intended as a joke. Patco Brands, however, argues that this action constitutes anticompetitive cybersquatting and…

Read More

“U.S. Patent Review Reforms Ignite Debate Over Efficiency and Stability in Intellectual Property Law”

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s recent overhaul of patent review practices has caused a stir among legal professionals and industry experts, with substantial debate evident at a recent conference. Many attorneys have voiced apprehensions about increased uncertainty, while the potential for policy shifts between administrations was noted by a former agency director. These concerns…

Read More

Welch’s Fruit Snacks Launches ITC Action Against Cibo Vita Over Patent Dispute in Yogurt Snack Market

In a recent development, the manufacturer behind Welch’s Fruit Snacks has initiated proceedings at the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) against Cibo Vita, accusing the firm of patent infringement concerning its yogurt-covered snacks. The case highlights ongoing tensions in the competitive fruit snack market, as companies strive to protect their innovations in packaging and product…

Read More

EmblemHealth Challenges Alexion’s Soliris Patent Practices in Federal Court Appeal

EmblemHealth is making a significant legal move in its ongoing dispute with AstraZeneca’s unit Alexion Pharmaceuticals. The nonprofit insurer has petitioned a federal judge in Massachusetts to allow an appeal to the First Circuit. This appeal challenges a decision that significantly reduced the scope of its class action suit, alleging that Alexion utilized questionable patent…

Read More

Federal Circuit Evaluates Additional Actions Against Sanctioned Patent Lawyer for Misconduct

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently scrutinized a patent lawyer who had previously been sanctioned for misconduct. During the session, the panel of judges questioned the lawyer’s behavior and explored whether additional disciplinary actions might be warranted to address the issues raised. In a detailed examination, the court focused on specific…

Read More

U.S. District Court Dismisses Patent Case Against Green Revolution Cooling, Affirming Industry Standards in Data Center Technology

In a decisive legal victory for Green Revolution Cooling Inc., U.S. District Judge Alan Albright has dismissed a patent infringement case that accused the company of violating a competitor’s patent related to electronics cooling products used in data centers. The ruling, delivered just before the trial was to commence next month, signifies a substantial legal…

Read More

Massachusetts Court Advances Patent Dispute Between Abiomed and Getinge’s Atrium Medical Corp.

Abiomed, a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson MedTech, remains embroiled in a legal confrontation after a Massachusetts federal judge declined to dismiss claims regarding an alleged patent infringement. The case centers on a blood pump technology contested by Atrium Medical Corp., a unit of Getinge AB, a Swedish medical device company. This legal proceeding unfolds…

Read More

“Rising Value of Legal Expertise: Merck General Counsel’s $5.8 Million Compensation Reflects Industry Trend”

As the landscape of executive compensation in the corporate legal sector continues to evolve, Merck’s General Counsel, Scott Marrs, stands out, earning over $5.8 million in total compensation for 2025. This figure underscores the increasing value that pharmaceutical giants place on legal expertise in navigating regulatory challenges and complex global markets. The compensation package reflects…

Read More

U.S. Trade Commission Probes Patent Infringement Claims in Robust Consumer Electronics Market

The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has commenced an investigation following allegations from Belkin that a competitor is importing and distributing screen protectors that infringe on three of its patents. This move underscores the growing focus on intellectual property rights within the consumer electronics accessories market. Belkin, a prominent player in the accessory sector, claims…

Read More

Federal Circuit Examines Clarity in Purdue Pharma Patent Dispute Over Abuse-Deterrence Technology

A recent session at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit became a scene of evident frustration as judges engaged with attorneys from Purdue Pharma LP and Accord Healthcare Inc. The legal debate centered around whether a Delaware district court’s decision to invalidate Purdue’s abuse-deterrence patent was adequately specific in its reasoning. Judges…

Read More

USPTO’s New Ex Parte Reexamination Rules Could Lower Filings and Streamline Patent Disputes

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is implementing a significant procedural change that could reshape the landscape of patent law by potentially decreasing the number of ex parte reexamination filings. This new procedure allows patent owners to respond directly to reexamination requests, adding a crucial opportunity for defense before any action is taken. Legal…

Read More

Starbucks Drops Patent Lawsuit Against Irish Entities Amid Ongoing Debate on ‘Patent Trolls’

Starbucks Corp. has decided to withdraw its lawsuit against two Irish entities that it had accused of violating Washington State’s laws concerning “bad faith” patent claims. This legal move came to light with a joint motion filed in a Washington federal court that requested the dismissal of the case. The lawsuit’s termination signifies a strategic…

Read More

Samsung Pursues New Trial Over $78.5 Million Patent Verdict as Industry Awaits Implications

Samsung Electronics Co. has announced its intention to seek a new trial following a jury’s decision in the Eastern District of Texas that found the company liable for $78.5 million. This verdict stems from allegations that Samsung infringed on patents related to automatic content recognition technology, specifically used for commercial advertising purposes. The tech giant…

Read More