The recent settlement between T-Mobile and Kaifi LLC underscores the nuances and potential pitfalls associated with the wording of settlement agreements, especially concerning ex parte reexaminations (EPRs). The case revolves around T-Mobile’s strategic use of a contingency payment to finalize litigation, shedding light on the challenges faced by alleged infringers when contesting patents through the…
A patent-holding company has petitioned a Texas federal judge for a new infringement trial against DoorDash, alleging that the food delivery company’s conduct resulted in “prejudicial errors.” The request also seeks a favorable judgment on the enablement defense. In July 2026, a jury in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas found…
In a recent ruling, a patent-holding entity has been mandated to pay approximately $821,000 in attorney fees and costs to eHarmony and The Meet Group. This financial obligation follows unsuccessful patent infringement lawsuits, which were challenged under the U.S. Supreme Court’s Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International decision. The Alice test, which determines the patent…
In a notable decision, a divided panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a lower court’s ruling favoring Amazon, absolving the tech giant from claims of patent infringement against AlterWAN Inc. The case centered around a network patent, the validity and interpretation of which have been hotly contested. The majority…
The Federal Circuit recently affirmed a Pennsylvania federal judge’s ruling, confirming that Globus Medical Inc. did not infringe on the spinal surgery tool patents held by Moskowitz Family LLC. The decision underscored the significance of patent language, specifically how the opening statements, or preambles, can narrow the scope of patent claims. This legal interpretation was…
The U.S. Supreme Court is being called upon to revisit its Alice test, a pivotal standard determining patent eligibility. This appeal comes from the proprietor of several patents aimed at enhancing the way consumers locate products within stores. These patents were invalidated under the current Alice criteria in a legal confrontation with Target. The case…
Norton Rose Fulbright has taken strategic steps to strengthen its intellectual property litigation team in Dallas by bringing on a partner from Holland & Knight LLP. The new addition is expected to bolster the firm’s capability in handling complex IP disputes, a sector experiencing heightened demand among clients seeking robust defense strategies. The lateral move…
In a recent legal development, a Texas federal magistrate judge recommended that Cellspin Soft Inc.’s patent lawsuit against Fossil Stores I Inc. should not be dismissed. The case revolves around technology enabling the automatic publication of social media content, a legal battle that echoes previous proceedings in California where the allegations were dismissed. The Texas…
In a recent decision, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) invalidated all challenged claims of a chip patent held by licensing company Daedalus Prime. The ruling marks a significant victory for British semiconductor firm Arm Ltd., who contested the patent’s validity. The proceedings centered on a patent initially associated with former tech giant Intel,…
Apple Inc. has petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to review a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which upheld the International Trade Commission’s (ITC) finding that certain Apple Watch models infringed patents held by Masimo Corporation. Apple contends that the Federal Circuit improperly lowered the threshold for establishing a domestic…
A recent report by the Association for Accessible Medicines highlights a significant gap in the development of biosimilar drugs, noting that 90% of biologic products losing patent exclusivity by 2034 lack corresponding biosimilar development. This oversight threatens potential cost savings and innovation in the pharmaceutical industry, as it underscores the enduring impact of current patent…
In a move that underscores the increasing activity within the pharmaceutical intellectual property space, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Director John Squires has instituted ten new Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) reviews. Notably, none of the 10 petitions were rejected, highlighting the critical scrutiny and evolving dynamics within patent litigation and review processes. These…
The booming cannabis and psychedelics industries are attracting widespread attention, presenting complex intellectual property hurdles. Over the past five months, activity within these sectors has surged, fueled by both government initiatives and commercial expansion. This rapid growth has brought renewed attention to patent strategies and the protection of innovative developments. Companies operating in cannabis and…
As patent infringement threats continue to loom over corporations, the strategic use of declaratory judgment actions is experiencing a renewed interest. This trend is influenced by recent developments in patent law, including the evolving Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) practices and proactive measures by major platforms like Amazon. Traditionally, companies accused of patent infringement…
In a recent development from the Delaware federal court, a judge has declined to overturn a jury verdict ordering medical device company Kurin to pay $1.6 million to Magnolia Medical Technologies. This decision comes following accusations that Kurin infringed on three patents related to blood culture collection products. The court dismissed Kurin’s request for a…
Genius Sports Ltd. and Panda Interactive have reached a settlement in their patent dispute concerning technology critical to the rapidly evolving sports betting industry. This agreement was confirmed through a notice filed in the Texas federal court, effectively putting an end to a contentious legal battle just before trial proceedings were set to begin. The…
A recent decision by a California federal judge has refused Deckers Outdoor Corp.’s request for a new trial concerning the validity of the design patent for its Ugg Classic Ultra Mini Boot. The court found no error in presenting the question of indefiniteness to a jury. This development is pivotal in the ongoing legal battles…
A $445 million verdict awarded to Netlist Inc. against Micron Technology Inc. is under intense scrutiny as the Federal Circuit examines potential pitfalls in the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (PTAB) prior invalidation of claims related to two critical computer memory patents. During a recent hearing, a Federal Circuit panel critically evaluated Netlist’s assertions that…
Bottler Shibuya Hoppmann and dairy company HP Hood recently faced a legal setback when a Delaware federal judge declined their request for a new trial concerning the validity of Steuben Foods’ bottle sterilization patents. This decision followed the Federal Circuit’s partial revival of a $38 million infringement verdict against these companies. The judge’s ruling underscores…
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) recently divided in its decision to invalidate claims from two patents held by Seikagaku Corp., a Japanese company specializing in pharmaceuticals. The challenges were brought forward by Charles River Laboratories, a research and development company known for its work in the biomedical sector. The board’s decision hinged on…
In a recent legal development, a California federal judge delivered a nuanced decision in a case involving pharmaceutical giant Eli Lilly. The company faced legal challenges over alleged unfair competition practices related to compounded versions of its diabetes and weight loss medications. The court dismissed Eli Lilly’s claims that a physician group and pharmacy falsely…
Munger Tolles & Olson LLP is making a strategic move to bolster its intellectual property team in San Francisco by welcoming a new partner from Paul Hastings LLP. Known for representing high-profile clients such as Meta, Google, Comcast, and Netflix, the new addition aims to enhance Munger Tolles’ competitive edge in the rapidly evolving tech…
A seasoned professor from the University of Virginia School of Law is set to bring his extensive experience in tort, administrative, patent, and international intellectual property law to the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Having educated future legal minds for over 15 years, the professor has announced his intention to assume the role…
A professor from the University of Virginia School of Law has announced his intent to assume the role of General Counsel at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). With over 15 years of experience teaching tort, administrative, patent, and international intellectual property law, his move is poised to bring a wealth of academic…
A New Jersey federal judge recently determined that Sandoz’s plans to produce a generic version of a nasal spray patented by Janssen Pharmaceuticals, a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson, would lead to patent infringement. This ruling underscores the ongoing complexities in the pharmaceutical industry where generic manufacturers frequently navigate the delicate landscape of patent boundaries….