U.S. ITC Proposes Disclosure Rule to Enhance Transparency in IP Litigation Funding

The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has proposed a new rule aimed at enhancing transparency in intellectual property litigation. This proposal would mandate that parties involved in IP cases disclose any entities with financial or ownership interests in the case, which notably includes litigation funders. The rule, announced last Thursday, is designed to provide greater…

Read More

Pennsylvania Patent Attorney Sues Former Partner Over Firm’s Closure, Elevating Concerns in Legal Sector Partnerships

A legal dispute has surfaced in Pennsylvania, where a patent attorney has lodged a lawsuit against his former partner, alleging that the partner’s mismanagement led to the firm’s downfall. This lawsuit, filed in a state court, accuses the ex-partner of improperly winding down the firm’s operations and neglecting to compensate the attorney for his entitlements….

Read More

Supreme Court Leans Toward Protecting Generic Drug Makers from Pharmacists’ Prescription Decisions

“`html In a recent Supreme Court argument involving Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA v Amarin Pharma, the bench expressed skepticism towards litigation aimed at holding a manufacturer liable for pharmacists’ actions regarding prescriptions. The case centers around Hikma, a manufacturer of generic pharmaceuticals, and its relation to Amarin Pharma, the patent holder of Vascepa, a medication aimed…

Read More

Federal Circuit Clarifies Limits of Retroactive Inventor Corrections in Patent Disputes

In March 2026, the Federal Circuit delivered a significant ruling in the case of Implicit, LLC v. Sonos, Inc., addressing the interplay between inter partes review (IPR) proceedings and the retroactive correction of inventorship. The court’s decision underscores the importance of timely action in patent litigation and clarifies the limitations of retroactive corrections in the…

Read More

Buchalter PC Strengthens IP Team with Strategic Hire of Dual-Expertise Patent Attorney in California

Buchalter PC has expanded its intellectual property team with the addition of a versatile engineer-turned-patent attorney. The firm recently welcomed Lauren Carpenter to its Los Angeles and San Francisco offices. She brings significant experience from Mintz, where she honed her skills as a patent litigator and registered patent attorney. Carpenter’s unique background in engineering, coupled…

Read More

Federal Court Upholds PTAB in Google Patent Dispute, Underscoring Tech Industry’s IP Challenges

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has reinforced Google’s position in a legal battle regarding targeted advertising technology, upholding the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (PTAB) decision to invalidate certain claims made by Wildseed Mobile LLC. The legal dispute centered on the obviousness of the patent claims, a crucial factor in patent…

Read More

Sheppard Mullin Expands IP Litigation Strength with Acquisition of Perkins Coie Team

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP has expanded its intellectual property litigation capabilities by acquiring a 15-lawyer team from Perkins Coie LLP. This strategic move is a significant development for Sheppard Mullin as it seeks to bolster its IP practice, a crucial area in the ever-evolving legal landscape involving patents and technology. The new team,…

Read More

Texas Court Decision on Longford Capital’s $32.3 Million Arbitral Award: Implications for Patent Monetization Disputes

In a notable development in patent litigation, Longford Capital has made a compelling plea to a Texas federal court to confirm a $32.3 million arbitral award. The dispute centers around allegations that a patent monetization firm improperly diverted its share of a settlement to an offshore account. Longford Capital dismisses claims of arbitrator corruption and…

Read More

U.S. Federal Circuit Court Orders Reexamination of FedEx Patents in Qualcomm Dispute

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has instructed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) to revisit its decision invalidating FedEx Corp.’s patents related to shipment monitoring technologies. The legal development responds to a challenge by Qualcomm Inc., targeting the legitimacy of FedEx’s intellectual property. Alongside ordering a reassessment of these patents,…

Read More

Supreme Court Bypasses New Guidelines on Generic Drug “Skinny Labels” Amid Patent Concerns

The U.S. Supreme Court, during a session this Wednesday, avoided establishing new guidelines regarding the use of “skinny labels” by generic drug makers, indicating that existing legal frameworks might provide adequate grounds for their decision. A skinny label allows a generic drug to be marketed for non-patented uses, which can help avoid patent infringement claims,…

Read More

USPTO Director Squires’ Strategic Decisions Reshape Future of Patent Review Process

In a recent development at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), Director John Squires has made significant decisions regarding inter partes review (IPR) petitions. Squires, overseeing these matters since his appointment, chose to turn down 10 petitions for patent reviews under the America Invents Act. However, he also greenlighted four challenges in his latest…

Read More

USPTO’s Ruling in Samsung vs. Netlist Highlights Complexities in Patent Enforcement and Trade Disputes

In a recent development at the juncture of patent law and international trade, John Squires, the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), denied Samsung’s efforts to challenge a patent held by Netlist for a memory module. The decision comes amidst ongoing legal proceedings at the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), highlighting complexities…

Read More

Federal Circuit May Docket: Key Patent Battles Involving Intel, Amazon, and More

As the Federal Circuit gears up for its May docket, legal professionals are closely monitoring three pivotal legal clashes. Each case poses significant implications for patent law and corporate litigation, featuring tech giants and multibillion-dollar stakes. One key case involves the ongoing battle between VLSI Technology and Intel over chip patents. Intel seeks to overturn…

Read More

Federal Circuit Upholds Invalidation of Vehicle Monitoring Patent, Citing Alice Standard Criteria

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently upheld a decision invalidating a patent related to vehicle monitoring for unauthorized use. The case involves a Texas gas chemical supplier that was accused of patent infringement. The appeals court agreed with a lower court’s determination, finding that the patent in question did not pass…

Read More

DOJ Antitrust Probe Targets Rambus Amid Concerns Over Competitive Practices in Semiconductor Industry

Rambus, the technology company known for its innovations in the semiconductor industry, is facing scrutiny from the U.S. Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division. The company confirmed it received a grand jury subpoena as part of an ongoing investigation into potential antitrust violations. This move signals intensified regulatory attention on industry practices that may hinder competition….

Read More

Caleb Williams’ Trademark Battle Over “Iceman” Nickname Highlights Intellectual Property Challenges in Sports

The recent trademark applications by Chicago Bears quarterback Caleb Williams have sparked a legal contest over the nickname “Iceman,” illustrating the complexities of intellectual property rights in sports. Williams filed four trademark applications on March 16, seeking to capitalize on the moniker he earned following a standout NFL season. This action has ignited a three-way…

Read More

Fenwick & West Expands Patent Litigation Team with Key Hires from Winston & Strawn

Fenwick & West LLP has expanded its patent litigation practice by adding a team of five attorneys from Winston & Strawn LLP. This move enhances Fenwick’s capabilities in telecommunications, hardware, software, and semiconductor sectors. The team includes partners Krishnan (KP) Padmanabhan and Scott Border, who will be based in Fenwick’s New York and Washington, D.C….

Read More

Fenwick & West LLP Expands Patent Litigation Capacity with Strategic Acquisition from Winston & Strawn LLP

On April 29, 2026, Fenwick & West LLP announced the acquisition of a five-lawyer intellectual property team from Winston & Strawn LLP. This strategic move aims to bolster Fenwick’s patent litigation capabilities, particularly in the fields of telecommunications, hardware, software, and semiconductors, a critical focus area for the firm. The new team includes seasoned attorneys…

Read More

Federal Circuit Upholds Cisco Triumph in Centripetal Patent Dispute, Setting Precedent for Detailed Claims

In a notable decision, the Federal Circuit upheld a Virginia federal judge’s ruling in favor of Cisco, finding that the tech giant did not infringe on Centripetal Networks’ cybersecurity patents. The case, which centered on allegations that Cisco’s products violated a trio of patents held by Centripetal, was closely watched by professionals in the field…

Read More

Samsung Prevails in PTAB Dispute Against Maxell, Shaping Video Processing Patent Landscape

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) has dismissed all claims that Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. contested in two video processing patents owned by Maxell Ltd., marking a significant development in the ongoing patent litigation between the two tech giants. This decision comes after Samsung challenged the validity of Maxell’s patents, arguing that the claims…

Read More

Federal Circuit Invalidates Patents but Upholds $1.68 Million Verdict Against LG in Complex IP Dispute

In a recent development, the Federal Circuit Court has invalidated key claims of digital communications patents held by Constellation Designs LLC. Despite this, LG Electronics Inc. remains liable for a $1.68 million verdict following a jury’s finding of infringement linked to broadcast standards. This decision highlights the complex interplay between patent invalidation and liability for…

Read More

Orrick Enhances IP Expertise with Former USPTO Attorney to Strengthen Client Support in Innovation Protection

Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP has strategically reinforced its intellectual property capabilities by bringing on a former attorney from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). This addition is part of Orrick’s ongoing efforts to deepen its expertise in IP law, a crucial area for numerous corporate clients seeking robust protection for their innovations. The…

Read More

Teleflex and Medtronic Settle Patent Dispute, Paving Way for Future Innovation in Medical Device Industry

Teleflex and Medtronic have resolved their legal conflict concerning catheter patents, a case highlighted by the recusal of the presiding judge, who felt unable to decide the matter. This settlement concludes a contentious dispute between the two prominent medical device companies, ensuring that both can now redirect their focus towards innovation in the healthcare sector….

Read More

Teleflex and Medtronic Settle Patent Dispute Over Catheter Technology Amid Industry Shake-Up

Medical device giant Teleflex has reached a settlement with Medtronic to conclude their patent litigation over catheter technology. The resolution comes after a judge acknowledged challenges in proceeding with the case due to complexities inherent in patent disputes. The agreement brings to an end a contentious legal battle that has seen both companies defend their…

Read More