The U.S. Department of Justice recently conceded a significant procedural misstep during the trial of prominent appellate attorney Tom Goldstein. In filings to the Fourth Circuit, officials acknowledged that they mistakenly interchanged crucial statutory terms concerning jury instructions. Despite this admission, they maintained that the error was “understandable” and should not warrant overturning the guilty…
As November approaches, the Federal Circuit is set to hear several pivotal cases that could have significant implications for intellectual property law and government liability. One of the key cases involves whether the U.S. government can be held accountable for patent infringement related to Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccines. This case could determine the scope of liability…
As the Federal Circuit prepares for its November docket, legal professionals are closely monitoring three pivotal cases that could have significant implications. First on the agenda is the high-stakes debate surrounding whether the U.S. government can be held liable for patent infringement allegations linked to Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccines. This case could redefine governmental immunity in…
In a significant legal development, Google has been denied a motion to dismiss a lawsuit concerning the alleged misuse of a former NPR host’s voice for AI. David Greene, previously known for his role on NPR’s “Morning Edition,” claims that his voice was improperly utilized within a Google AI tool for podcasts. A California judge…
Mallet & Co., a leading name in the baking industry, has successfully secured a permanent injunction against a competitor after a legal battle over trade secrets. The injunction, granted by a federal judge, prevents the rival from accessing or disclosing proprietary baking product information. This decision also comes with a mandate requiring the competitor to…
The widow of a Miami real estate investor has filed a malpractice lawsuit against Eugene Pettis, a former president of the Florida Bar, alleging that his representation led to the loss of her claim to her late husband’s $350 million estate. The legal filing asserts that Pettis’s handling of the case resulted in substantial financial…
In a recent legal decision that highlights the intricacies of patent law, a federal judge in New Jersey upheld the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s (USPTO) decision to deny an extension for two patents related to a cancer treatment. The patent holder’s bid to extend exclusivity was rejected, despite claims that the denial would result…
In a recent decision, Australian Supreme Court Judge Claire Harris has upheld the contentious ban on Vegemite in Victorian prisons, ruling it is “demonstrably justified” based on concerns related to management, security, and the welfare of inmates. This ruling comes in the wake of a legal challenge by prisoner Andre McKechnie, who contended that the…
Anthropic, the AI research company, has reportedly selected JPMorgan Chase to spearhead its U.S. retail offering in an initial public offering (IPO). This decision aligns with Anthropic’s strategic expansion and underscores the growing importance of AI technologies in the financial landscape. The selection of JPMorgan as a lead underwriter is seen as a critical step…
In a significant development in the legal community, the chief federal prosecutor in Los Angeles has been disqualified from a high-profile case by a federal judge. The decision has amplified discussions about impartiality and ethics within the justice system. This ruling was handed down on [October 5, 2023](https://news.bloomberglaw.com/business-and-practice/los-angeles-top-federal-prosecutor-disqualified-judge-rules?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=BUNW&utm_campaign=000001a1-41db-d24f-a1a9-cddf39dc0001), following concerns over potential conflicts of interest….
In a significant development for streaming services and artists alike, a California federal judge has dismissed the proposed class action lawsuit brought against Spotify by rapper RBX. The suit accused Spotify of allowing bot-generated streams to distort streaming data and impact royalty payments for lesser-known artists. The court’s ruling eliminates the case permanently, concluding that…
The UK Crown Prosecution Service has charged two British men under the National Security Act 2023 for their alleged involvement in a plot targeting RAF Fairford, a US-run military air base in England. The charges against 24-year-old London residents Mohmed Ahmad Abdulkarim and Nouman Essghir stem from a suspected Iranian-backed scheme, representing a significant application…
Cybersecurity company CrowdStrike is attempting to persuade the Federal Circuit to compel a transfer of a patent infringement suit from Texas to California. The contentious legal battle involves allegations that CrowdStrike infringed on various patents owned by the University Technology Licensing Program, a subsidiary of Arizona State University, highlighting a strategic maneuver by the company…
The U.S. Copyright Office has recently altered its stance on the registration of online content updates, a shift largely driven by its earlier exclusion from the registration process of websites with narrowly focused news coverage like Page Six, Decider, and Mansion Global. This change comes after these digital platforms faced refusals due to a rule…
In a significant development for the North Carolina Business Court, two seasoned attorneys have been nominated to fill vacancies on the court’s bench. This follows the recent retirements of two judges. The nominees, drawn from the ranks of Williams Mullen and Robinson Bradshaw & Hinson PA, bring a wealth of experience to the state’s specialized…
The potential for artificial intelligence (AI) to manage entire enterprises is generating both interest and controversy. Delaware’s proposal to enable companies to be operated solely by AI agents, named as Artificial Intelligence Companies (AICs), has caught the attention of lawmakers and industry experts alike. This novel approach could redefine corporate structure, allowing humans to step…
A security company recently filed a trademark infringement lawsuit against a group of comedians. The controversy stems from the comedians’ use of the company’s uniforms in a series of comedic videos. These videos depict a fictitious security guard engaging in unprofessional behavior towards skateboarders, raising questions about the balance between creative expression and trademark rights….
This week, Harvard Law School and DePaul University College of Law announced unprecedented financial contributions received from alumni. Both institutions were the beneficiaries of historic gifts, significantly bolstering their financial resources. These donations, made by graduates from the class of 1976, reflect a growing trend of substantial alumni contributions that have become vital for the…
In a legal skirmish that has drawn attention within intellectual property circles, Smucker is defending its trademark registrations for crustless peanut butter and jelly sandwiches against allegations by Trader Joe’s. The grocery chain claims that the trademarks were obtained fraudulently, leading to a request for their cancellation. However, Smucker countered in an Ohio federal court…
In a significant decision, the Eighth Circuit Court has ordered the Federal Reserve to abandon the 21-cent cap on debit card swipe fees. The court found that the Federal Reserve improperly considered banks’ fixed costs when determining this cap, raising questions about the balance between regulatory controls and financial institutions’ operational expenses. More details on…
The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals recently ruled that a copyright on a compilation of writings does not extend to an individual article within that collection. This decision came with the affirmation of summary judgment in favor of two individuals who included the article in a published book. This pivotal ruling clarifies the scope of…
In a notable development in the music industry, a lawsuit accusing the rapper Drake of copyright infringement has been withdrawn. The plaintiff, a music producer, had claimed that Drake used an unpublished hook from the producer’s demo in one of his hit songs, allegedly copying it “word-for-word, note-for-note”. This decision to drop the suit was…
In a significant development for intellectual property law professionals, a Connecticut federal judge has ruled against former partners at the law firm Ohlandt Greeley Ruggiero & Perle LLP in their dispute over client origination credits. This decision marks the conclusion of a prolonged disagreement among key members of the firm, highlighting persistent challenges within the…
In a strategic move to enhance its cross-border tax advisory services, DLA Piper has announced the addition of a seasoned expert from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). This new hire aims to fortify the firm’s capabilities in assisting multinational corporations navigate complex international tax regulations. The newly appointed team member, who previously led a key…
The Fourth Circuit has affirmed a district court’s decision that West Virginia’s Daniel’s Law is unconstitutional, a development stirring conversations around the First Amendment’s reach in regulating privacy protections for government officials. This legislation, passed in West Virginia, sought to limit the dissemination of home addresses and phone numbers of law enforcement and judicial figures….