Last week, Law360 highlighted several key law firms and stories that captured significant attention within the legal industry. The roundup provided insights into pressing legal developments, trends, and expert analyses that are shaping the landscape for legal professionals. With over 200 articles published daily across various topics, Law360 remains an essential resource for those needing…
In a recent decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit expressed significant concerns regarding a former partner at Benesch Friedlander Coplan & Aronoff LLP and their handling of a client’s trade secrets lawsuit. The attorney in question chose to represent a trade secrets suit client while simultaneously negotiating employment with the opposing…
In a pivotal decision, the Federal Circuit has set a precedent requiring patent owners to ensure that all licensees mark products with patent information to qualify for pre-suit damages. This ruling is expected to significantly influence patent licensing negotiations and provide defendants with opportunities to limit or evade damages. Legal professionals are closely analyzing the…
In a recent development within the biotech sector, ProfoundBio and Genmab have petitioned a Seattle federal judge to dismiss a lawsuit initiated by pharmaceutical giant AbbVie. This legal action accuses two scientists, formerly employed by AbbVie, of misappropriating trade secrets related to cancer therapies. The two biotech firms argue that the claims are not only…
The creators of the “Friday the 13th” franchise have filed a lawsuit targeting a video game publisher for allegedly withholding substantial royalties. The legal action, initiated last Friday, claims that royalties of up to $4.5 million from the game sales were not properly disbursed. Accusations extend to the destruction of financial documents that could have…
In a notable decision, the US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit has determined that Kalshi’s attempt to sidestep Nevada’s gambling laws by branding its sports bets as “swaps” under federal law does not hold water. This ruling marks a significant moment for prediction markets, particularly in the context of differing regulatory landscapes across…
American Airlines is facing continued legal challenges as a Texas federal judge recently refused to dismiss a patent infringement lawsuit brought by Intellectual Ventures. The dispute centers on technology related to in-flight Wi-Fi services, a critical component in the modern aircraft experience. This development marks a significant step for Intellectual Ventures, a patent licensing company,…
Apple is facing a legal challenge in Texas federal court, where it has been accused of infringing on 5G technology patents. The lawsuit was filed by an affiliate of Longhorn IP, which claims that Apple’s iPhones and iPads incorporate technology that violates its intellectual property rights. This legal battle adds yet another layer of complexity…
The recent outcome of the Google privacy button litigation underscores the substantial financial implications for legal practitioners. Notably, a U.S. federal court ruling has resulted in a staggering $147 million in legal fees. This figure stems from a settlement in a class-action lawsuit where Google faced allegations regarding the misleading nature of its private browsing…
In a significant development for intellectual property rights in the automotive industry, a Texas federal judge has upheld a jury verdict favoring engineering firm Robert Bosch LLC in a patent infringement case brought by a Canadian fuel system company. The court concluded that the plaintiff did not satisfy the stringent requirements necessary to overturn the…
In a pivotal legal development, a California federal judge has awarded $146.8 million in fees to plaintiffs’ attorneys following a substantial jury verdict against Google LLC. The case, a privacy class action, resulted in a $425 million award covering around 98 million individuals. The fee, representing one-third of the verdict, was deemed extraordinary but justified…
Baltimore Ravens quarterback Lamar Jackson’s efforts to expand his brand beyond the football field have encountered a legal hurdle. Despite his successes on the field since his Most Valuable Player (MVP) season, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) recently denied his attempt to register “Era 8 By Lamar Jackson” for use on clothing and…
In a recent legal development, a Texas federal judge ruled in favor of Samsung Electronics Co., terminating a lawsuit brought by Mullen Industries over allegations of patent infringement. The dispute centered on claims that location-based services used in Samsung’s mobile devices violated patents held by Mullen. This decision, rendered on Friday, aligns with the earlier…
In a recent legal development, a federal judge in Ohio has ruled that Trader Joe’s must defend itself against a trademark infringement lawsuit brought by J.M. Smucker Co. The case involves allegations that Trader Joe’s has infringed on Smucker’s trademark for its Uncrustables, the popular crustless peanut butter and jelly sandwiches. The ruling, delivered last…
Amid ongoing legal battles surrounding the opioid crisis, pharmacy benefit managers OptumRx and Express Scripts have petitioned the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. Their appeal seeks to reverse U.S. District Judge Dan Polster’s July 27 order, which opened the doors for 800 plaintiffs to sue them. The case highlights the increasingly complex…
The Federal Circuit recently transferred T-Mobile’s appeal regarding a patent litigation settlement to the Fifth Circuit. This decision emerged from a case initially handled by the Eastern District of Texas, which had jurisdiction when the appeal was lodged. The case exemplifies the often complex interplay between district and appellate jurisdictions in patent disputes, a dynamic…
Across the United States, municipalities are increasingly withdrawing from contracts with Flock Safety, a company known for its license plate reading cameras. A Bay Area-based advocacy group has reported that 214 cities and counties have terminated agreements with Flock since 2021. In a dramatic display of this trend, 90 of these terminations occurred in August…
In a recent decision, an appellate court has ruled that state entities are immune from damages under the Genetic Information Privacy Act (GIPA), highlighting a significant development in the landscape of genetic privacy litigation. This ruling is particularly relevant as litigation concerning GIPA is experiencing a notable increase. The decision effectively exempts government employees from…
The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) is examining allegations against Apple, claiming the tech giant’s devices have infringed on a patent related to the exchange of contact information. This patent dispute underscores the competitive tensions in the tech industry over innovations that facilitate seamless communication between devices. As outlined in a recent report, the controversy…
In a rare collective decision, the entire bench of San Francisco County’s judiciary has recused itself from presiding over a lawsuit alleging racial bias within the District Attorney’s Office. This unprecedented move pushes the decade-old trial to October, requiring an external panel of judges to oversee the proceedings. The case stems from allegations that the…
In a recent legal development, a Texas federal magistrate judge has recommended dismissing patent infringement claims against Uber Technologies Inc. The judge’s ruling revolves around the jurisdictional challenge, asserting that the presence of Uber’s ride-hailing drivers in the district does not suffice to establish venue for the lawsuit. This decision highlights the complexities involved in…
This summer, the legal industry has seen significant shifts in its executive leadership as major law firms such as Simpson Thacher, Paul Hastings, Vinson & Elkins, and Mayer Brown have taken steps to bolster their C-suite ranks. This wave of hiring comes amid evolving challenges, including the necessity to manage a more dynamic lateral movement…
In July 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit delivered a significant ruling in Wyeth LLC v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, affirming the invalidation of Wyeth’s patent claims for lack of enablement. This decision underscores the stringent requirements for patent specifications, particularly in the realm of pharmaceutical treatments. Wyeth’s patents, U.S. Patent Nos….
In a recent decision that will resonate with retailers across the nation, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit opted to uphold a Texas federal court ruling dismissing claims against Bath & Body Works and The Buckle. The litigation accused these retailers of infringing on an e-commerce patent. The Federal Circuit’s decision, handed…
Buchalter PC has expanded its presence in Atlanta by recruiting an esteemed litigator from Chamberlain Hrdlicka White Williams & Aughtry. The addition of this experienced attorney is expected to significantly bolster Buchalter’s litigation practice, particularly in the areas of commercial litigation and creditor rights. The new hire, a former shareholder at Chamberlain Hrdlicka, brings a…