Connecticut Legal Malpractice Case Highlights Risks in Loan Advisories by McCarter & English LLP

In a pivotal courtroom revelation, a Connecticut state court heard that McCarter & English LLP, along with one of its Connecticut-based attorneys, allegedly did not meet the required standard of care while advising insurers on loan transactions amounting to $20 million. According to an expert witness, these transactions failed when the borrower ceased payments, leading…

Read More

Legal Malpractice Claim Against Pennsylvania’s Former Acting Attorney General Seeks to Define Professional Accountability

In a case capturing the attention of legal professionals, a former acting attorney general of Pennsylvania is facing efforts to sustain a malpractice claim against him and his law firm, van der Veen Hartshorn & Levin. The contour of this legal battle unfolded in Pennsylvania federal court, where an elections nonprofit swiftly countered a motion…

Read More

Georgia Law Firm Faces Insurer’s Malpractice Lawsuit Amid Rising Accountability in Legal Sector

A legal malpractice lawsuit has been filed against a Georgia-based law firm by its insurer. This suit arises from an alleged claim of negligence involving one of the firm’s attorneys. The insurer contends that the attorney’s actions led to significant financial losses, prompting the pursuit of recovery through legal channels. For more details on this…

Read More

State Bar of California’s Disciplinary Trial Unveils New Allegations Against Former Girardi Keese Attorney

The unfolding legal drama involving Robert Finnerty, a former attorney at the now-defunct firm Girardi Keese, took a significant turn this week during a disciplinary trial before the State Bar of California. The bar’s prosecutor accused Finnerty of concealing the firm’s alleged misappropriation of funds from a substantial $53 million settlement awarded to a family….

Read More

Vinson & Elkins Faces Legal Malpractice Suit Amidst History of High-Profile Claims

Vinson & Elkins, a prominent Houston-based law firm, is facing a legal malpractice lawsuit concerning its involvement in a Texas real estate transaction. The suit alleges that the firm provided negligent legal services, resulting in significant financial losses for the client. This case is not the first instance where Vinson & Elkins has encountered malpractice…

Read More

Wheeler Trigg O’Donnell Takes Helm in Pivotal Mintz Levin Malpractice Litigation

Wheeler Trigg O’Donnell has taken on representation for Mintz Levin in a legal malpractice lawsuit that has captured the attention of the legal community. This development was highlighted by legal tracking services such as Law.com Radar, which monitors litigation across over 2,600 state and federal courts. The case involves intricate issues typical of such high-stake…

Read More

Ukrainian Billionaire’s $1.8 Billion Lawsuit Faces Dismissal Amidst Allegations of Misconduct: Implications for Legal Malpractice Standards

In a Massachusetts federal courtroom, law firm Pierce Atwood and two of its attorneys have called for the dismissal of a lawsuit brought by a Ukrainian billionaire. The legal action targets them over a $1.8 billion damages decision involving the investor’s faltering biotech company. The firm contends that the billionaire’s improper conduct was the underlying…

Read More

Federal Prosecutors Seek Forfeiture of SCOTUSblog Founder Tom Goldstein’s Assets Following Conviction

Federal prosecutors are pursuing a $1.98 million forfeiture judgment against Tom Goldstein, the founder of SCOTUSblog, who has been convicted. They are also petitioning a Maryland federal judge to transfer ownership of Goldstein’s Northwest D.C. home to the government as a method of settling the financial implications of the judgment. This legal action marks a…

Read More

Rising Legal Malpractice Claims in 2025 Prompt Calls for Enhanced Risk Management and Technology Integration

Recent surveys have revealed a notable increase in the frequency of legal malpractice claims in 2025. According to industry insights, this uptick is largely attributed to evolving client expectations and the complexities of new legal challenges facing firms today. The findings underscore a trend that legal professionals must address to safeguard their practice and reputation….

Read More

Rise in Legal Malpractice Claims Linked to AI and Cybersecurity Concerns: 2025 Survey Insights

In a noteworthy shift, insurers have reported a rise in the frequency of legal malpractice claims in 2025, ending a multi-year trend of stagnation. This uptick has been tied to a variety of factors, including the burgeoning use of artificial intelligence within the legal sector. This information emerges from the recent legal professional liability insurance…

Read More

Supreme Court Declines to Review Malpractice Case Against Akin Gump in DNA Patent Dispute

The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to review a former Cornell University graduate student’s attempt to revive his malpractice lawsuit against Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. This decision marks the end of a long-standing dispute stemming from a patent litigation case against Illumina Inc., focused on DNA sequencing intellectual property. Details surrounding this…

Read More

$1.7 Billion Malpractice Suit Against Winston & Strawn Moves Forward in Texas Court, Reflecting New Era of Legal Scrutiny

The legal landscape for law firms representing high-stakes corporate clients continues to be rigorous, as seen with the recent decision concerning Winston & Strawn. A Texas bankruptcy court has largely allowed a $1.7 billion malpractice suit against the firm to proceed. Initiated by the trustee of fintech company GloriFi, the suit accuses the firm of…

Read More

Federal Judge Advances Malpractice Suit Against Mintz Levin Over Disputed $2 Million Success Fee

A recent decision by a Massachusetts federal judge has allowed a legal malpractice suit to proceed against Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC. This case, which centers around a contentious $2 million “success fee,” was not halted despite Mintz’s request. The judge’s decision underscores ongoing legal tensions surrounding fee disputes and client-firm relationships….

Read More

Massachusetts Judge’s Ruling Keeps Legal Malpractice Suit Against Mintz Levin Active Amid Contested $2 Million Success Fee Dispute

A recent decision from a Massachusetts federal judge has allowed a legal malpractice suit to proceed against the prominent law firm Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC. This ruling comes in the midst of a contentious $2 million “success fee” dispute between Mintz and a former client. The law firm had sought to…

Read More

“Appellate Court Blocks Arbitration in Legal Malpractice Case Against Jackson Lewis P.C.”

A state appellate court has denied Jackson Lewis P.C.’s attempt to compel arbitration in a legal malpractice lawsuit filed against the firm. The court’s decision underscores the judiciary’s careful scrutiny of arbitration agreements, particularly when they intersect with claims of professional negligence. The malpractice suit stems from Jackson Lewis’s representation of an in-home senior care…

Read More

New York Court Upholds Dismissal and Sanctions in DLA Piper Malpractice Case, Setting Cross-Border Legal Standards

In a significant legal decision, a New York appellate court has confirmed the dismissal of a legal malpractice suit against the international law firm DLA Piper. The case was brought by a Chinese software company, alleging malpractice. However, the court not only dismissed their claims, but also imposed a substantial sanctions order amounting to $482,000…

Read More

New York’s Legal Malpractice Cases Press for Definitive Causation Standards amid Debate

Legal malpractice cases in New York face growing scrutiny regarding the need for clear causation standards. The ability to demonstrate a direct link between an attorney’s alleged negligence and the client’s damages remains a pivotal aspect of these cases. The necessity for precise and consistent guidelines in establishing this causation is emphasized by ongoing debates…

Read More

New York Judges Uphold DLA Piper in Malpractice Case, Influencing Future Legal Standards

DLA Piper has received judicial backing from New York judges amidst an ongoing malpractice lawsuit. The legal giant has been embroiled in a complex malpractice case, where plaintiffs claimed the firm provided inadequate legal representation in a prior litigation. However, a recent ruling seems to favor DLA Piper’s position, potentially steering the case towards a…

Read More