The arrest of a Florida resident accused of orchestrating a $5 million Bitcoin escrow scheme has highlighted vulnerabilities in the legal handling of digital assets. Investors allege that the individual purportedly exploited a law firm’s position as an escrow agent to misappropriate significant funds. This incident underscores the critical importance of law firms having a…
A consulting company based in Colorado has raised allegations of legal malpractice against an Am Law 200 firm and a now-defunct law firm, claiming the mishandling of a lending transaction resulted in a $10 million loss. This accusation was brought to a state court, spotlighting significant financial and reputational implications for the firms involved. As…
Recent appellate decisions have highlighted the potential for using collateral estoppel as a defense against legal malpractice claims. Collateral estoppel, or issue preclusion, prevents the re-litigation of issues that a court has already decided. Leveraging this doctrine can be particularly effective in protecting attorneys from claims that hinge on previously resolved issues. In practice, estoppel-based…
In recent years, appellate courts have increasingly considered the use of collateral estoppel as a defense strategy in legal malpractice claims. This approach reinforces the finality of previous verdicts, preventing relitigation of issues already decided in earlier cases. The practical application of this doctrine can significantly alter the landscape of malpractice litigation. Collateral estoppel, sometimes…
In a developing legal confrontation, former executives from the e-commerce firm Volusion LLC have initiated legal malpractice litigation against the prominent law firm, Jackson Walker LLP. This legal action, filed on November 5, 2025, is rooted in claims of an undisclosed personal relationship between a then-partner at Jackson Walker and a Texas bankruptcy judge, a…
A complex legal battle is unfolding as a group of cannabis companies alleges that the law firm Hinckley Allen & Snyder LLP engaged in malpractice, causing them over $25 million in damages. The allegations center around claims that Hinckley Allen, during a 2017 investor suit, prioritized the interests of a manager over those of the…
Attorneys are bound by ethical standards designed to uphold the integrity of the legal profession and protect client interests. Violations of these standards can lead to disciplinary actions, including suspension or disbarment. However, whether such violations provide a direct cause of action for clients seeking civil remedies is a nuanced issue. The American Bar Association’s…
Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP is currently embroiled in a legal dispute involving a healthcare technology company that has accused the law firm of malpractice. This case has escalated to the point where the company is urging a New Jersey state judge to compel the law firm to cover over $3.5 million in counsel fees…
A legal malpractice suit against McCarter & English LLP has gained renewed attention as a biotech company recently appealed to a New Jersey appellate panel, seeking to revive its case. The biotech firm argues that its claims of malpractice are independent of McCarter & English’s efforts to recover unpaid fees from the company. This legal…
In a recent development, Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr has requested that a Philadelphia judge dismiss a legal malpractice lawsuit brought against the firm by former Conrail CEO David LeVan. This request follows a federal court decision upholding an $11 million arbitration award against LeVan, related to his involvement in a failed casino project in…
Stinson LLP faces legal malpractice claims, but the decision has been made to take these claims to arbitration rather than court. This development highlights the growing trend toward resolving legal malpractice disputes through private arbitration. The directive to arbitrate was confirmed in a recent legal proceeding, underscoring arbitration clauses’ enforceability in legal service contracts. More…
In a significant verdict, Morgan & Morgan has successfully secured a $1.1 million malpractice judgment against a rival law firm. This decision comes after a protracted legal battle where the defendants attempted to deflect responsibility and minimize the damages experienced by the plaintiff’s side. The outcome highlights the ongoing challenges and complexities within the legal…
A former attorney from Smith, Gambrell & Russell (SGR) is facing allegations of legal malpractice, with claims that his actions compelled a client to accept a settlement significantly below the case’s actual value. The client, who had initiated a lawsuit against his sister over undue influence concerning their mother’s estate, asserts that the attorney’s conduct…
A recent decision highlights the challenges lawyers may face when navigating legal malpractice claims in complex securities cases. In a ruling that resonates throughout the legal community, a California appellate court has ruled that attorney Gibson Dunn must contend with allegations of legal malpractice related to his representation in a securities matter. The case arose…
The Pennsylvania Superior Court recently affirmed the dismissal of a malpractice lawsuit against a New York-based intellectual property attorney. The appellate court determined that the plaintiff, a chemical company specializing in paint removal products, lacked the requisite ties to Pennsylvania for the case to proceed there. The decision underscores the importance of jurisdictional connections in…
A legal storm is brewing for a Denver-based law firm and one of its partners, as they face allegations of malpractice in a high-profile case. The legal complaint centers on accusations of professional negligence in their handling of a construction litigation matter. Reports indicate that the case could have significant implications for how firms manage…
In a recent development from the California courts, FisherBroyles LLP’s attempt to dismiss a $10 million malpractice lawsuit was thwarted when a judge ruled against the firm’s motion. The lawsuit, initiated by a stem cell treatment center, accused the law firm of legal malpractice related to patent filing, and Monday’s decision indicated the firm missed…
A California state appeals court has upheld the dismissal of financial elder abuse and aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty claims brought by two former co-counsel of disbarred attorney Thomas Girardi against his son-in-law. The court also affirmed the dismissal of an aiding and abetting claim against a company operated by Girardi’s estranged wife….
Lowenstein Sandler LLP is actively contesting a motion to narrow its legal action against Trif & Modugno LLC, insisting that the crux of the dispute is rooted in dishonest business practices rather than issues of legal malpractice. The case stems from allegedly unpaid services provided to a cannabis dispensary, underscoring the complexities of financial transactions…
Lewis Brisbois, a major player in the legal industry, is facing litigation as one of its attorneys is sued for legal malpractice and breach of duty. This comes at a time when law firms are increasingly under scrutiny for their professional conduct, which makes the case significant for corporate legal departments and law firms alike….
A medical research and development company has brought negligence allegations against a New York-based law firm, claiming mishandling in a patent licensing dispute. The firm, specializing in real estate and business law, now faces these malpractice claims head-on as they unfold in a legal arena. According to reports, the plaintiff states that the firm’s inadequate…
In a significant law procedural move, a former client of Morgan & Morgan is contesting an order that directed his malpractice claims into arbitration. The client alleges that a federal judge in Savannah, Georgia, has erred by misapplying legal principles and ignoring pertinent facts of the case. The ruling also denied a motion to remand…
The Georgia Court of Appeals has opted to dismiss an appeal in a legal malpractice suit involving Greenberg Traurig LLP following the death of attorney Joel Katz, who was central to the case. This decision marks a notable turn in a dispute initiated by a record executive, which alleged professional missteps by Katz, previously recognized…
In recent months, a series of legal malpractice claims have emerged against the prominent personal injury firm Morgan & Morgan. Five lawsuits are currently pending, spearheaded by Mark Tate of the Tate Law Group and Brent Savage of Savage Turner Pinckney Savage & Sprouse. Both legal professionals indicate that more claims might be forthcoming, as…
In a recent development, a Maryland federal judge has decided to allow the majority of a malpractice and gross negligence suit to proceed. This litigation involves Whiteford, Taylor & Preston LLP, triggered by accusations from the founder of a construction company. The allegations arise from a situation where hackers allegedly stole $4 million from the…