In a recent statement, United Nations experts have spoken out against US-imposed sanctions targeting the International Criminal Court (ICC). The measures, sanctioned by an executive order from former US President Donald Trump, include asset freezes and travel restrictions on ICC staff and affiliates. These sanctions come in response to the ICC’s issuance of arrest warrants for high-ranking Israeli officials, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
The experts argue that the US executive order infringes upon international rule of law and compromises justice for victims of war crimes. They contend that it hinders the ICC’s capacity to hold offenders accountable, potentially empowering war criminals. This move undermines what they refer to as the “never again” legacy, a reference to the post-World War II Nuremberg Trials.
Importantly, the UN experts highlight that justice should be applied universally, and any attempts to pressure or intimidate ICC personnel go against the Rome Statute. Although the US has not ratified the Rome Statute, which established the ICC, the experts stress that the court’s jurisdiction extends to efforts aimed at impeding its officials.
The executive order, signed on February 6, declares that the ICC’s actions threaten US sovereignty and national security by purporting to have jurisdiction over the US and its ally, Israel. The ICC swiftly decried the sanctions, stating that its role in prosecuting grave human rights violations remains crucial.
Despite the controversial sanctions, support for the ICC remains robust. In a demonstration of international solidarity, 79 countries reaffirmed their unwavering backing of the court. The incident underscores ongoing tensions between the US and international legal bodies, spotlighting the diplomatic complexities entwined in matters of global justice and accountability.