Russia Amplifies Cyber Censorship with New Telegram Restrictions, Human Rights Watch Warns

On the occasion of the World Day Against Cyber Censorship, Human Rights Watch (HRW) raised alarms over Russia’s latest actions to intensify internet censorship. This was prompted by the Russian government’s restrictions on Telegram, which remains one of the nation’s most favoured social media platforms. Hugh Williamson, Europe and Central Asia director at HRW, expressed grave concerns regarding the tightening grip of state control over internet access in Russia, highlighting the threat to an open and free internet.

On February 10, 2026, numerous users began experiencing difficulties accessing Telegram. The Federal Service for Supervision of Communications, Information Technology, and Mass Media (Roskomnadzor) confirmed these “gradual restrictions,” citing non-compliance with Russian legislation as the reason behind the crackdown. Russian media have indicated plans to fully block Telegram by April. Telegram’s founder, Pavel Durov, criticized the government’s actions, suggesting that they are aimed at pushing citizens towards using a state-controlled app designed for surveillance and censorship. More details on these events are available here.

This move is part of a broader history of online censorship in Russia. Last year, authorities blocked calls through Telegram and WhatsApp, citing a need to combat scams and prevent sabotage or terrorism. The systemic restrictions have severely limited access to websites and platforms deemed threatening to state narratives, especially after Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine. Most Russian users now rely on virtual private networks (VPNs) to access widely used platforms like Instagram, Facebook, and YouTube. In 2024, digital rights and civil society groups had called on major platforms like YouTube and Google to stand resistant against Russian censorship efforts.

As the government continues these efforts, the situation raises profound questions about the future of digital freedoms in Russia and the impact on global perceptions of internet governance.