The Supreme Court of the United States prepares to commence its 2026-27 term with oral arguments scheduled to begin on the first Monday in October, a date established as the official start of the Court’s term. This year, a notable environmental case, Suncor Energy (U.S.A.) v. Commissioners of Boulder County, has taken the spotlight as…
The Supreme Court is set to confront a series of cases in its October 2026 term, touching on pivotal legal questions. One major case is Suncor Energy (U.S.A.) v. Commissioners of Boulder County, in which a Colorado county claims that oil and gas companies contributed significantly to climate change, affecting local communities. This case surfaces…
The emergence of advanced reproductive technologies presents novel challenges to the existing legal frameworks within the United States, prompting a crucial inquiry into their constitutional underpinnings. With the Supreme Court maintaining a conspicuous silence on matters relating to reproductive innovations, we find ourselves amidst a significant constitutional vacuum. As identified within the original essay collection,…
“`html In a controversial decision, the U.S. Supreme Court’s majority permitted the Trump administration to proceed with terminating Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Haitian and Syrian citizens, determining that racial discrimination did not motivate this policy shift. Despite acknowledging derogatory remarks by Trump and then-Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem, the justices ruled these comments…
“`html Timing has emerged as a critical factor in the ongoing legal battle over mail-in voting, a key issue that has found itself on the Supreme Court’s emergency docket. At the heart of the dispute is President Donald Trump’s executive order, which aims to overhaul mail-in voting procedures. The order is being challenged by a…
A consortium of 23 states, along with the District of Columbia, has implored the Supreme Court to maintain an existing federal court decision from Boston, which effectively prevents the application of a certain executive order on mail-in voting for the upcoming November elections. Notably, this executive order, signed by President Donald Trump on March 31,…
The phrase “Born Free and Equal,” adopted from the Declaration of Independence, serves as a guiding principle for a new column by Professor Stephen Calabresi, as he illustrates in his inaugural article for SCOTUSblog. As we mark the Declaration’s 250th anniversary, its core ideal, stating that “all men are created equal,” continues to resonate through…
The metaphor of a “law trapped in amber” has unexpectedly surfaced in recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions, raising intriguing implications for constitutional interpretation. Chief Justice John Roberts articulated this metaphor in United States v. Rahimi, implying that recent Second Amendment rulings should not be viewed as immovably rooted in historical context. This metaphor has since…
The Trump administration is shifting its focus to a controversial issue known as “birth tourism”, as part of its broader immigration restrictions. This practice involves foreign nationals traveling to the United States with the intent to give birth, securing U.S. citizenship for their newborns. This initiative follows a Supreme Court ruling that invalidated an executive…
The 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence prompts reflection on its sole identified audience: the international community. The document calls for a “decent respect to the opinions of mankind,” an ideal that seems increasingly absent in contemporary United States jurisprudence. Notably, the current Supreme Court reflects this shift by resisting acceptance of internationally recognized…
As the U.S. Supreme Court justices conclude their summer term, reflections upon recent Second Amendment cases, United States v. Hemani and Wolford v. Lopez, reveal critical developments in firearm regulation interpretation. These decisions mark the court’s first multiple Second Amendment rulings in a single term since District of Columbia v. Heller, where self-defense as an…
“`html In a legal maneuver with significant implications for both international relations and domestic law, the Palestinian authorities have approached the United States Supreme Court seeking intervention against a $656 million judgment. This amount was the outcome of a lawsuit filed by American victims of attacks in Israel. The lawsuit was initially brought under the…
In a comprehensive analysis of the Supreme Court’s recent term focusing on criminal law, it becomes apparent that the Court has devoted significant attention to this area. An overview of the term reveals that 60% of the Court’s merits cases were linked to criminal law topics, underscoring its substantial engagement with such issues. This perspective…
A legal conundrum awaiting the U.S. Supreme Court could alter the landscape of retirement planning for more than 100 million Americans. The case, Anderson v. Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee, which revolves around employer-sponsored retirement plans governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), is set to decide whether litigation burden could dissuade employers…
In the current composition of the United States Supreme Court, Justice Brett Kavanaugh has fashioned a reputation as a significant contributor of concurring opinions, earning him the moniker as a potential “great concurrer” of the Roberts court. His distinctive jurisprudential style has implications for both the internal dynamics of the court and its public perception….
Former President Donald Trump has indicated his intention to involve the Supreme Court in his legal battle against Hillary Clinton, the Democratic National Committee, and others. Trump claims they conspired to damage his 2016 campaign through unfounded allegations of collusion with Russia. This potential Supreme Court action represents the latest chapter in the prolonged political…
Donald Trump has petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to review an $83.3 million defamation verdict against him, escalating a legal battle that has captured significant attention in both legal and political circles. Trump’s appeal is centered around a defamation case initiated by journalist E. Jean Carroll, in which a federal jury awarded Carroll a substantial…
Legal News Analysis The U.S. Supreme Court’s recent term has sparked significant discussions regarding its powers, particularly its conservative tilt and decisions affecting areas like federal agency independence, voting rights, and campaign finance. In the wake of such rulings, there is a renewed push among Democrats to alter the Court’s dynamic by expanding its size…
In a recent address, Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch emphasized the importance of studying American history comprehensively, with all its “warts, glories, and all.” Speaking virtually from Prague to a forum organized by the Ronald Reagan Center on Civility and Democracy, Gorsuch described American democracy as “very fragile” and stressed that no person or group…
“`html In a recent legal development, former President Donald Trump has approached the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn a jury verdict that awarded $83.3 million to writer E. Jean Carroll. The verdict was for defamation, following Carroll’s claim that Trump sexually assaulted her decades ago in a Manhattan department store. Trump’s legal team contends that…
The Trump administration, contrary to prior indications, has apparently opted not to petition the Supreme Court for a rehearing on its executive order concerning birthright citizenship. The order aimed to discontinue the automatic granting of U.S. citizenship to nearly anyone born on American soil—a practice many regard as enshrined by the 14th Amendment. The order…
The tradition of the United States Supreme Court’s summer recess has become a point of contention, with arguments emerging on both sides of the debate. Historically, since the early 20th century, the Supreme Court has halted all merits cases from July through September, resuming on the first Monday of October. However, this extended pause contrasts…
In the latest term, some concurring opinions from the U.S. Supreme Court have sparked discussions regarding potential shifts in legal interpretations. Justice Clarence Thomas delivered a noteworthy concurring opinion in Mullin v. Doe where he challenged the application of the equal protection clause to the federal government, suggesting Bolling v. Sharpe was wrongly decided. Justice…
The debate over Temporary Protected Status (TPS) in the United States persists as both legal and political dimensions develop. Recent Supreme Court decisions have intensified discussions around the status, particularly following the Court’s move to limit lower courts’ capacity to block the revocation of TPS. This judicial development has not silenced the battle but rather…
The Trump administration has taken its legal battle to the Supreme Court, seeking approval to enforce an executive order aimed at tightening mail-in voting regulations. The administration argues that the measures are essential to ensure election integrity, although critics claim they may disenfranchise eligible voters. The executive order, signed by President Trump, outlines new rules…