Recent comments from Justice Samuel Alito have ignited debate over the perception of Supreme Court justices as being above the law. Alito’s views have drawn criticism, with Justice Elena Kagan emerging as a counter-voice of reason amidst the controversy. Drawing attention to the ethical standards of the Court, Kagan represents a growing sentiment that the Supreme Court should not be exempt from the laws it either interprets or upholds.More on this here.
In an unrelated case, an attorney found guilty of committing serial wire fraud raises critical questions about the integrity of the legal profession and, in particular, the responsibilities practitioners carry when serving their clients. Details of the case can be found here.
The recent decision by a historical Philadelphia law firm to close its doors serves as a stark reminder of the financial realities facing many law firms today. This underscores the need for more than just goodwill within the profession, as business viability remains an ongoing concern. Read more about this story here.
In other news, Columbia Law has found itself in the crosshair of critics alleging it is circumventing the Supreme Court. The law school is battling these claims, with supporters suggesting that Alabama, not Columbia, is the one challenging the Supreme Court’s stance. More on this can be found here.
Finally, Stroock Law Firm’s eagerness to secure a merger has sparked debate about the lengths to which legal firms should accommodate business pursuits. This comes after the firm proposed reducing its pension plan to become a more attractive merger partner. Discover more here.