Following recent developments in the New York litigation landscape, the source-of-income antidiscrimination statute in the New York State Human Rights Law (NYSHRL) has been declared unconstitutional. Lend focus to the ruling presided over by New York State Supreme Court Judge Mark G. Masler in Cortland County, in which the contentious ruling was passed. The case in mention is People v. Commons W., LLC, 2023 NY Slip Op. 23213 (Sup. Ct. June 27, 2023).
In the ruling, Judge Masler deemed that the NYSHRL’s source-of-income antidiscrimination statute violated the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The Fourth Amendment, for context, guards against unreasonable searches and seizures, and ensures the sanctity of individual privacy against unwarranted intrusions by the State.
This declaration of unconstitutionality raises significant implications for both corporations and law firms alike, and is expected to be a paradigm shift in the state’s legal proceedings related to human rights law.
Unfortunately, the full text of the article from JD Supra isn’t currently publicly available. However, the understanding can be deepened by carefully considering this summary and keeping tabs on developing news on this front, especially in terms of legal responses and potential appeals.
To reiterate, the declared unconstitutionality of the source-of-income antidiscrimination statute under the NYSHRL is of notable significance in current legal happenings. This judgment raises new questions about the balance between personal rights, as deemed by the Fourth Amendment, and specific discrimination protection measures. As such, it’s important for legal professionals in corporate law and human rights law fields to carefully study and consider the implications of this ruling.