The allocation of office spaces in many BigLaw firms, particularly those with window views, has recently come under scrutiny by midlevel associates looking to improve their working conditions. A striking point of contention has been the method of assigning these prime spots, with many associates expressing that an office space’s allocation should be based more on physical presence in the firm, rather than pure seniority.
An anonymous associate from an Am Law 100 firm voiced their frustrations, stating, “If someone is not coming into the office regularly (and unless there is a legitimate reason such as parental leave), then they should not have a window office.” The associate noted that many window offices remained uninhabited as their occupants worked remotely, leaving those who consistently worked onsite confined to windowless offices.
These sentiments were part of comments collected in the American Lawyer Midlevel Associates Survey. Other notable responses from the survey can be found here.
As firms continue to adapt to flexible work modes following the impact of the pandemic, it is evident that discussions around workspace allocations are going to be a central part of negotiations. Associates are increasingly demanding a working environment that reflects their commitment and presence in the office, which may bring about some level of change in traditional practices.
It remains to be seen how law firms will navigate these new requests, but there is a clear signal that the demands of the new-age legal professional are changing. And whether it’s the struggle for window views or other similar concerns, BigLaw firms may need to reassess their office space policies to foster a positive work environment for their associates.