E-Cigarette Giant VPR Brands Battles Intellectual Property Dispute with Chinese Manufacturer

Recently, VPR Brands issued a notable challenge to a Georgia federal court, requesting a dismissal of counterclaims alleging that its latest product violated the intellectual property rights of Elfbar, an e-cigarette produced by a Chinese manufacturer. The crux of VPR Brands’ argument is that there is nothing deemed "distinctive" in the "shape, coloring, font [or]…

Read More

Trademark Law and Translation: Understanding the Global Implications for Creative Works Protection

Recent developments in trademark law have highlighted the challenges associated with translating creative works into other languages and the legal implications this brings. In particular, a precedential opinion by the US Patent and Trademark Office’s Trademark Trial and Appeal Board emphasized the intricate nature of intellectual property rights and their limitations. The case, which involved…

Read More

NYSHRL’s Source-of-Income Discrimination Statute Deemed Unconstitutional: Implications for Equitable Housing Practices

In a significant recent decision, New York State Human Rights Law’s (NYSHRL) source-of-income anti-discrimination statute has been ruled unconstitutional. The ruling, in the case of People v. Commons W., LLC, throws a spotlight on the difficult equilibrium between promoting equitable housing practices and protecting constitutional rights. The source-of-income discrimination statute was formulated to ensure that…

Read More

NLRB Ruling Shifts Framework Towards Union-Friendly Approach, Impacts Employer Negotiations

In a shift from over fifty years of established law, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has issued a decision that mirrors a union-friendly framework. This decision was announced on August 25, 2023, in the context of Cemex Construction Materials Pacific LLC (N.L.R.B., Case 28-CA-230115). As per this recent development, the ruling outlines a changed…

Read More

Navigating Expert Witness Debates: Lessons from the Google Play Store Litigation

A recent legal development casts an interesting light on the procedure colloquially known as the “expert hot tub.” Broadly defined, this term refers to an in-court, on-the-record “debate” between dueling expert witnesses, involving the direct participation of the court, parties, and the experts themselves in questioning roles. Particularly prevalent in antitrust class action practices, these…

Read More

Employee Monitoring in Law Firms: Balancing Productivity and Privacy Concerns

Law firms across the globe are grappling with an increasingly contentious issue: employee monitoring. In the pursuit of efficiency and productivity, firms are adopting technologies to track virtually every aspect of their staff’s workaday lives; from badge swipes to keystrokes. The debate around these practices is heating up, with critics arguing the intrusion into personal…

Read More

Goldman Sachs Case: The Second Circuit’s Impact on Price-Impact Mismatch Framework

The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has recently passed a verdict decertifying a class of stockholders who had made allegations against Goldman Sachs. They claimed that the banking giant was maintaining an inflated share price by resorting to misrepresentations about its business principles and its policies related to conflicts-of-interest. The case…

Read More

Massachusetts Appellate Court Addresses Property Flooding and Road Improvement Disputes

In a noteworthy development, the Massachusetts Appellate Court recently offered its perspective on a private nuisance issue arising from property flooding claims supposedly triggered by neighboring road improvements. The case in question is Gillis v. Town of Uxbridge, No. 22-P-641, 2023 WL 5111539 (Mass. App. Ct. Aug. 10, 2023). The court’s decision, made public on…

Read More

Whirlpool’s $11.5 Million Penalty Spotlights Corporate Responsibility in Consumer Safety

The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) recently announced that globally-renowned home appliances manufacturer, Whirlpool Corporation, has conceded to pay a hefty $11.5 million civil penalty. This substantial settlement arises from the CPSC’s charges asserting that Whirlpool deliberately did not promptly report, as mandated by law, that 17 models of their electric radiant heat cooktops had…

Read More

California Insurance Department Warns Insurers Over Misleading Long-Term Care Advertising

The California Department of Insurance (CDI) issued a bulletin on August 23, 2023, to insurers and brokers who are involved in selling long-term care (LTC) insurance in California. According to the bulletin, the CDI is worried about certain complaints received concerning marketing strategies aimed at encouraging Californian residents to buy LTC insurance prior to the…

Read More

EEOC Issues Proposed Rule on Pregnant Workers Fairness Act: Balancing Employee Rights and Employer Responsibilities

The United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) issued a proposed rule on August 11, 2023, related to the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA). The PWFA mandate affects all qualified employers and necessitates that they offer reasonable accommodations to eligible employees or candidates. The Act specifically targets individuals who have any known limitations associated with…

Read More

Illinois Mandates Cultural Competency Training for Healthcare Providers to Enhance Patient Satisfaction

In a recent development, Illinois healthcare providers have been mandated to undergo a culture competency training. This move seeks to enhance patient satisfaction and the quality of care by improving the level of cultural competence among providers. This newly mandated training forms an integral part of the ongoing focus on diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives…

Read More

Cooper Davis Act: Balancing Drug Control and Privacy Concerns in a Controversial Amendment

The Cooper Davis Act, an amendment proposed to the Controlled Substances Act in the United States, has been a controversial proposal stirring contentious conversations among differing stakeholders including parents, consumer safety advocates, and anti-drug coalitions, as well as the DEA, privacy experts, and constitutional scholars. A recent article details the ongoing disputes and disagreements. The…

Read More

California Quiet Title Act: Tsasu LLC v. U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. Sets Precedent for Property Rights Retention

Earlier in May 2021, the distinguished law journal, Money and Dirt, provided a penetrating analysis of a case adjudicated by California’s Second Appellate District — Tsasu LLC v. U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. This particular case held significant implications for the interpretation of Code of Civil Procedure section 764.060, a crucial element of California’s Quiet Title…

Read More

Ninth Circuit Revises Wit v. United Behavioral Health Ruling, Impacting Mental Health Coverage and Parity Law

In an unexpected development, the Ninth Circuit has once again revised its opinion in the Wit v. United Behavioral Health case. Affirming its prior ruling that denied motion to vacate and superseding its prior Wit Opinion, the federal appellate court has been persistent in its adaptations. This index case involves patients struggling with mental health…

Read More

University of Toronto Law School Returns $450,000 Amazon Donation Amid Transparency Concerns

The University of Toronto’s highly-regarded law school has announced that it will return a US$450,000 donation from Amazon. The reason for this dramatic step stems from recent criticism over a lack of transparency surrounding the source of the donation. In a statement, law dean Jutta Brunnée said, “The Faculty of Law upheld the University’s firm…

Read More