Texas House Bill 3485 Restricts Change Orders, Impacts Construction and Legal Professionals

For professionals in the world of corporate law and construction, especially those pertaining to the Texas jurisdiction, new legislation has passed which could have substantial effects on how change orders are handled. The legislation in question is House Bill 3485, recently passed by the Texas legislature. This bill sets a significant limit on owner-directed change orders for owner-directed work.

Set to take effect from September 1, 2023, and applicable for contracts entered into on or after this date, House Bill 3485 primary impacts concern the issuance of owner-directives; specifically, change orders only signed by the owner. The legislation restricts these to a maximum of 10% of the original contract price. Notably, this limitation applies whether considered individually or in the aggregate. The context and implications of this shift are ripe for analysis.

This limitation implies that both private and governmental owners will be unable to issue owner-directives for change orders exceeding this 10% threshold. Consider the potential implications of this change: on one hand, this could serve as a safeguard ensuring more accurate estimations in initial contracts and, therefore, reducing the reliance on subsequent owner-directed change orders. On the other hand, the construction industry often faces unforeseen circumstances which necessitate changes beyond the original scope of the contract. Consequently, this new legislation might exacerbate disagreements over change orders and escalate legal disputes further.

While Texas has typically been a jurisdiction that does not closely regulate construction dispute resolution in the private sector, this bill marks a shift in the paradigm. Undoubtedly, House Bill 3485 will impact legal professionals working with construction contracts, especially those involving substantial change order activities.

As legal professionals navigate this new terrain, it will be crucial to stay informed about further interpretations and implications of this legislation. Legalities aside, from business strategy to contract negotiations, this change will almost certainly demand a re-calibration of standard operational procedures in the relevant sectors. It emphasizes once again the dynamism of the legal environment and the need for practitioners to stay abreast of shifting laws and statutes.