Last week’s question in the legal profession: “Are legal rankings a substitute for thinking?” has sparked considerable discussion. The subject, presented by Christine Charnosky, a legal education reporter for Law.Com, appears to speak directly to leading figures in industry circles.
Debate on the matter rages on with a spotlight on the extent to which rankings impact decision-making practices in the profession. The sheer competitiveness of the legal environment globally underscores the pertinence of review systems. However, the question of whether reviews are taking precedence over independent thinking seems to continue to remain a bone of contention.
Comprehensive discussions of this topic can be found on Law.com with fresh perspectives coming to light daily. Charnosky presents a perspective worth studying.
Read Charnosky’s article for more information
Join in the discussion, engage in thinking, and let’s continue to foster a dynamic legal profession.