In an intriguing turn of events, a judge from the New York City Asbestos Litigation (NYCAL) court has granted a joint trial for two separate asbestos cases. The recent ruling allows for the consolidation of the Munna case and the LaMonica case, both of which revolve around disputations in asbestos actions.
This ruling was made following a careful review of the plaintiffs’ application for a joint trial, set against the standard of the ‘Malcolm factors’. While this measure usually requires all factors to be met for the court to permit a joint trial, this is not the case in this particular situation. The NYCAL Case Management Order (CMO) stipulates that even if not all the Malcolm factors are met, two trials may still be merged under certain circumstances.
The Malcolm factors usually taken into account include several crucial elements. These come from a set of litigation principles formed around differentiating key aspects of legal battles that are essential in ensuring each case gets a fair and equitable trial.
The NYCAL’s decision to grant a joint trial regardless of not all Malcolm factors being met, could lead to an interesting precedent for future cases undergoing asbestos actions. Legal professionals in larger corporations and law firms would do well to observe the outcome of this combined trial and its potential implications.
The original news can be found on JD Supra. To read the full details, please click here.