Donald Trump, former President of the United States, is attempting to cope with a multitude of legal problems that are currently occupying his schedule. He has devoted the majority of his time to addressing the accusations made by New York Attorney General Letitia James, Justice Arthur Engoron, Judge Tanya Chutkan, and Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis. More specifically, Trump’s previous motions to ask Judge Tanya Chutkan to recuse herself from his election interference case were denied. The argument and allegation of bias against him were dismissed, as the law and Circuit precedent indicate no wrongdoing on the judge’s part.
Last week was also filled with arguments regarding a proposed protective order from the government, preventing Trump from commenting on the surrounding court proceedings, lawyers, or potential witnesses involved in his case. Trump’s responsibility and actions for such a proposal were marked by controversial and damning remarks about Mark Milley, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
John Lauro, Trump’s lawyer, recently requested a “brief” 60-day delay for the current October 9 deadline to file pretrial motions in service of Trump. The request was submitted on the grounds of needing more time to look into exceedingly complex constitutional issues related to the defense’s argument, including the alleged wrongful charges related to a contested election. Furthermore, Lauro also filed an objection to standard ex parte proceedings that protect classified evidence under the Classified Information Procedures Act, while making an accusation of prosecutorial misconduct.
It appears Lauro has previously requested setting a trial date as far as in 2026, which has led to speculation about the propensity of his filing numerous diverting motions to delay the trial until post-2024. Such tactics, however, have not been well received by the courts thus far, resulting in a mandate for governmental response to these motions by the following Tuesday, with a set date for Trump’s reply by Friday.
To follow this case, it’s being tracked by Court Listener and can be found under the docket US v. Trump.