The seemingly tranquil role of a Judge typically conjures up imagery of refined legal discussions, the decisive pounding of a gavel, or elaborate legal dissections. Yet, a key aspect of the role is far less dramatic, and even somewhat mundane: the management of paperwork. As David Curlin, a judge in Henderson County, Kentucky, recently discovered, even judges can face severe consequences for failing to keep up with such matters.
The Tri State Homepage reports that the Supreme Court of Kentucky has indefinitely suspended Judge Curlin. This drastic action followed Curlin’s violation of a court order requiring him to respond to a set of charges issued by the Inquiry Commission. The specific charges remain unclear, although the overarching issue lies with the judge’s inability to address his paperwork on time.
The Tri State Homepage presents further details, stating that Judge Curlin failed to respond to bar complaints levied against him. Subsequent to this oversight, the Supreme Court of Kentucky gave him orders in March and April to show cause why he should not be suspended from the practice of law. Curlin’s written response indicates that he did not receive the motions for the March order due to the abrupt closure of his law office and a subsequent change in his employment address.
As a result of this scenario, Judge Curlin was ordered to formally respond to each charge by September 25th. In a show of leniency, the Court allowed an additional grace period of four days. Unfortunately, Curlin could not meet this extended deadline, leading to the Court’s suspension decision on September 30th.
In conclusion, this situation serves as a stark reminder to all legal professionals, irrespective of their position or rank, of the essential nature of timely paperwork. Even such a fundamental task, when neglected, can result in serious repercussions, as evidenced by this unprecedented suspension of an elected judge. The full article, and further details of this case, can be read on the Above the Law website.