Oregon Energy Council Backs Nolin Hills Wind Project, Overrides Local Setback Requirement

In a move that has garnered attention from legal professionals across the energy sector, on August 31, 2023, the Oregon Energy Facility Siting Council (the Council) issued a final order in support of a site certificate for the Nolin Hills Wind Power Project. The decision concludes an approval process that spanned over six years, beginning in September 2017, and carries significant implications for the continued development of renewable energy infrastructure in Oregon and potentially other U.S. regions. The Nolin Hills Wind Power Project is an ambitious renewable energy facility involving wind, solar, and energy storage components to be constructed in Umatilla County.

The Council’s decision anticipates local attempts to enforce more stringent regulatory measures on renewable energy projects, a common theme in legal battles across the U.S. In this case, the Council dismissed an attempt by the Umatilla County Board of Commissioners to implement a local two-mile setback requirement for renewable energy projects, in effect favoring federal regulations over local ones in the context of renewable energy project initiatives.

One could interpret this decision as indicative of a broader support to expedite renewable energy projects amidst growing global concerns for environmental sustainability. In such interpretations, the Council’s ruling may provide a procedural precedent for similar cases in the future – potentially encouraging the development of smaller renewable energy sites by curtailing local ordinances that could otherwise slow their implementation.

The case and the Council’s final order approval make clear that it is crucial for energy providers and legal professionals to closely monitor changes in regulatory frameworks and consider, not just national legislation, but also local level dynamics. Only by doing so can they anticipate potential roadblocks and develop comprehensive strategies for renewable energy projects.

The full order and case details are provided by Miller Nash LLP.