In a bold move, the state of New York has announced the option to substitute affidavits with affirmations in civil actions. This decision follows voiced concerns by the legal community over the requirement for notarizing documents, which many deemed burdensome. Alternatively, litigants and court practitioners can now provide an affirmation under penalty of perjury.
Read the full story here.
This shift in procedural practices recognizes the practical aspects of conducting legal affairs, especially in today’s digital era. It is also expected to significantly streamline civil proceedings. When an affirmation is chosen over an affidavit, individuals will be able to attest to the truthfulness of statement by signing under penalty of perjury, sidestepping the need for having their signature notarized.
The decision is seen as a practical response to the changing demands of the juridical system and is likely to become a model for other jurisdictions to follow suit. The legal fraternity, especially those involved with civil actions, should ascertain the guidelines for these affirmations and be acquainted with any new potential risks they might introduce.
The move, originating from a comprehensive review undertaken by Harris Beach PLLC, seeks to encompass all litigants and court practitioners involved in civil actions, moving away from the traditional notarizing process for legal documentation that some have found cumbersome.
As legal professionals, a responsibility lies on us to appropriately adapt to these new guidelines set forth. New York’s decision may indeed be indicative of a broader global trend as more regions look for ways to simplify their legal processes.