The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has recently begun seeking public commentary on its draft guidance on the application of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in the case of County of Maui vs. Hawaii Wildlife Fund
[1].
Priorly, the EPA had rescinded a guidance document issued during the Trump administration responding to the Maui decision.
[2].
The focal point of debate is whether or not discharged groundwater requires a Clean Water Act National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The outcome of this discussion may have extensive implications for corporations and legal professionals in environmental law sectors.
[3].
The specifics of the County of Maui vs. Hawaii Wildlife Fund case revolve around an aspect of environmental law that is particularly relevant to businesses in industries with potential pollutants. It involves the question of whether indirect discharge of pollutants into navigable waters through a conduit such as groundwater, would necessitate a NPDES permit under the Clean Water Act
[4].
The draft guidance by the EPA will interpret this Supreme Court decision and its application, thrusting an issue that previously seemed settled back into uncertainty. Legal professionals grappling with environmental law whose clients may be directly or indirectly impacted by these regulatory changes should follow this situation closely
[5].