As legal professionals, we are bound to uphold the law – a fact that, however, doesn’t imply an absolute endorsement of every jurisprudential provision. Notably, legal practitioners are privy to the intricate workings of the law, thereby unravelling the depth of problematic and contentious legal dispositions.
The question then arises: “What stands as the most problematic law?” A variety of answers are bound to emerge in response to such an inquiry, reflecting the diverse areas of contention within the legal framework.
One such area has been the qualified immunity law, a provision initially birthed as a scrivener’s error, this principle has increasingly been a source of controversy due to its role in permitting a high level of police impunity. The intriguing history and implications of this legal phenomenon can be explored further in “Police Can Legally Set You On Fire Because Someone In The 1800s Made A Copying Error“.
Additionally, the perceived immunity of the gun manufacturing industry has raised eyebrows amongst legal scholars, as the vetting of firearm manufacturers could directly alleviate the American gun problem. The nature of this significant issue is contextualised in “The Law The Needs To Be Repealed Immediately To Bring Gun Makers To Heel“.
Consideration also extends to the felony murder rule, which many argue perpetuates systemic injustice, as well as mandatory minimum laws that lead to sentencing outcomes deemed both excessive and unjust. More so, needless to say, the perennial questions about immigration laws and the validity of results wielded by the electoral college system have also dominated legal debates nation-wide. Perspectives on these rulings can be seen in articles like “It Looks Like Sotomayor Is 1 Of 3 Supreme Court Justices Who Actually Believes The Whole ‘Do The Crime, Do The Time’ Thing“, and “Why Does The DOJ Prosecute 20,000 People A Year For Immigration Crimes“.
In the same vein, legislations as seemingly trivial as age restrictions on trick or treating show that no aspect of law is beyond contention.
This conversation offers a platform for legal professionals to vent about, and hopefully inspire a critical re-evaluation of the most frustrating laws in existence. The original discussion is ongoing at “Sound Off: What Is *The* Worst Law?“, where recommendations for the most troubling laws are being compiled in preparation for a subsequent poll on the “worst law”.