It’s been an eventful year for copyright and trademark law, with several high-profile rulings from the US Supreme Court adding new dimensions to these crucial areas. These rulings have delved into aspects like trademark territoriality, fair use, and First Amendment protection, leaving some significant gaps for future deliberations.
Abitron Austria GmbH v. Hetronic International, Inc. threw a spotlight on the dividing line between foreign and domestic applications for the ‘use of commerce’ of a trademark. The decision in Abitron essentially overturns the locus-of-effects-based tests that federal appeals courts used to prefer, marking a shift toward a use-in-commerce test. Following this development, this subject is expected to attract the attention of federal circuit courts in the coming year.
In the coming months, legal observers will be taking note of two crucial cases. Commodores Entertainment Corp. v. McClary has seen the US Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit acknowledging Abitron’s significance, while Yammine v. Toolbox for HR Spolka z Ograniczona Odpowiedzialnoscia Spolka Komandytowa has led to the granting of summary judgment in an infringement claim. Based on these developments, we are expecting the Supreme Court to provide further direction in 2024.
In a landmark decision addressing transformativeness and fair use, Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith clarified that not every “use that adds some new expression, meaning, or message” is necessarily transformative and falls under fair use. The transition from derivative to transformative work and the commerciality of the use require careful consideration, leaving ample room for interpretation and legal scrutiny.
2024 also shows promising advances in the trademark space with the Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. VIP Products LLC case. It presents a unique intersection of trademark law and First Amendment rights. Importantly, this decision questions whether First Amendment protection extends to expressive marks used as source identifiers.
The upcoming rulings in the supreme court cases Warner Chappell Music v. Nealy and Vidal v. Elster are sure to bring further nuances to the realm of copyright and trademark law.
All these developments make it clear that 2024 will be a year full of legal debates as courts seek to clarify ambiguities and provide definitive interpretations to these key judicial decisions.
Note: The viewpoint expressed in this article does not necessarily reflect that of Bloomberg Industry Group, Inc., the publisher of Bloomberg Law and Bloomberg Tax, or its owners.