In recent discussions surrounding technological advancements in the legal domain, it’s important to note that AI-based applications like ChatGPT should not be misconstrued as legal research tools. The software’s chatbot-like functionality may provide certain simplifications in mundane tasks but does not augment or replace the meticulous research needed in law.
Emphasized by insightful legal experts such as Olga V. Mack, it’s crucial to acknowledge that technology’s role in the legal department should ideally be to facilitate processes and not supersede the specialist knowledge of legal professionals. An experienced Law fellow at CodeX, The Stanford Center for Legal Informatics, and Generative AI Editor at law.MIT, Mack understands the intersection of technology and the legal sphere.
Mack’s books like Get on Board: Earning Your Ticket to a Corporate Board Seat, Fundamentals of Smart Contract Security, and Blockchain Value: Transforming Business Models, Society, and Communities portend her understanding of legal advancements. Her future publications will further explore the role of legal operations in the AI and data era.
This conversation is part of a broader discussion within the industry – denoting the limitations and capacity of AI in legal realms. Although they can streamline certain processes, it cannot replace the expertise, judgement, and analytical skills of a legal professional. Therefore, the essence of sophisticated tools like ChatGPT should be to complement and not substitute.
For the full read, check here.