Antitrust Enforcers Warn Companies: Preserve Messaging App Chats or Face Consequences

The shift towards the utilization of instant messaging applications in workplaces, replacing traditional channels such as email, has led to a stark warning from federal antitrust enforcers: companies under investigation are obligated to surrender such records. Not doing so may not only result in fines but it could potentially prompt criminal charges for document destruction.
Bloomberg Law
reported these developments on Friday as the Justice Department and Federal Trade Commission announced updates to their communication language sent to companies under investigation. The changes clarify that companies are required to preserve and submit chats from platforms such as Salesforce’s Slack and other ephemeral messaging apps like Meta Platforms’ WhatsApp and Signal.

This urgent call arrives amidst increasing concerns raised by antitrust enforcers about the disappearance of chats and messages in recent cases. For instance, Alphabet Inc.’s Google stands under scrutiny by the Justice Department that demanded sanctions for the tech giant’s alleged failure to conserve internal communications between employees. Furthermore, it was reported that a federal judge rebuked Google’s top attorney, Kent Walker, last year for the company’s record-keeping practices resulting in obliterated messages on Google Chats, their internal messaging platform.

In another instance, the Federal Trade Commission leveled accusations at Amazon.com Inc., alleging that high-ranking employees, including the founder and ex-CEO Jeff Bezos, used the messaging app Signal to veil communications from the regulator during an antitrust violation investigation. However, Amazon has refuted these accusations, stressing that the company had informed the FTC about the Signal usage and that it had ‘painstakingly collected Signal conversations from its employees’ phones and allowed agency staff to examine those conversations.’

The legal professionals and corporations should be aware of such substantial implications related to workplace communication. Governance on such matters is becoming stringent; as such, all parties should ensure they’re updated with the evolving regulations to avoid potential legal pitfalls.