The University of Pennsylvania (Penn) had numerous reasons to dismiss law professor Amy Wax from her position over the years. Allegations include her offensive statement regarding black students at the law school, remarks suggesting America needed fewer Asians, and her controversial decision to invite white supremacists to the campus. [1] [2] [3]
The University decided to take action, referring Wax’s case to the Faculty Senate. A confidential recommendation was issued post-investigation, prompting Wax to appeal, leaving the situation in a state of ongoing deliberation.
The Daily Pennsylvanian confirmed that the hearing board’s recommendations comprised of a one-year suspension for Wax at half pay, obliging her to denote her disaffiliation with Penn during her public appearances, and dismissal from her named chair. However, they did not recommend her termination or the stripping of her tenure. [4]
Such lenient measures raise the question, what does it take for a professor to lose their job? Wax’s record includes writing articles about the supposed superiority of white culture and taking part in white nationalist conferences. While academic freedom shields scholars who present unpopular views, it does not cover, for instance, inaccurate citations, such as Wax’s reliance on Wikipedia for key points. [5] [6] [7]
Regardless of her academic work, Amy Wax’s behavior was unacceptable, as it devalued students based on their race. It is rather disconcerting to think that such conducts cannot lead to serious repercussions, adequately protecting the academic profession.
The hearing board’s decision may serve as a precedent for future cases that involve discriminatory behavior within academia.