The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has consented to revisit an issue regarding the Second Amendment implications of Hawaii’s ban on butterfly knives. According to a order issued on 22nd February, the court nullified its past judgment that upheld Hawaii’s prohibition as a means of regulation of what, legally, constitutes “arms”.
This move comes after a previous ruling by the Circuit that decided that the ban on butterfly knives contravened the definition of “arms” in the Second Amendment, as it is widely accepted that the term extended to bladed weapons at the time the amendment was adopted.
This development represents a notable turn in the debate over the reach of the Second Amendment, particularly with regard to the range of weapons it covers and how their regulation intersects with state laws. The rehearing of the case could potentially provide more clarity around the legal boundaries of gun control laws in the United States.
To stay updated with the developments of this case, follow the latest legal updates from law.com.