The legal sphere has witnessed significant changes with the advent of legal software. However, these groundbreaking transformations brought together a new challenge – the establishment of trust. It’s not just a matter of high performance or reliability; the conversation revolves around user education and transparency.
Transparency, in this context, refers to understanding the mechanisms that underlie a given software: the data it is using, its functionality, and the algorithms that back the results it displays. Asserting transparency doesn’t mean turning every lawyer into a software engineer. Instead, it’s about offering enough clarity about the software workings to enhance users’ confidence.
Imagine using an AI-powered legal research tool. The tool displays results, but without a glimpse into its reasoning process – a succinct summary of the algorithms used or an explanation of its evaluation process – the tool might raise doubts. Clear understanding often leads to greater confidence.
However, building trust does not stop at ensuring transparency; user education plays a significant role. It is a two-way process, where software providers educate users about their product and duly understand the unique needs and challenges associated with the legal profession. Adding context to the software within the legal environment moves beyond tutorials and help manuals. For example, how does a document automation software comply with contemporary data protection laws? How does an AI-driven contract analysis tool meet ethical standards?
In every legal software, the human element should be central – legal profession is hinged on human expertise and judgment. With advancing technology in legal software, the aim should not be to replace, but enhance human skill and prowess. In essence, lawyers ought to exploit these software tools to augment their abilities, not downplay them.
Building trust involves confronting the fear of change and the unknown. While the legal field is steeped in time-honored traditions, simplifying new technologies and evidently communicating their benefits can alleviate such concerns. The path to trust in legal software is a fine interplay between user education and transparency. This involves demystifying technology to an extent that users can visualize the mechanics and comprehend the logic behind their operation.
As we embrace these digital tools, we are not merely adopting new software; we are transitioning into a more informed, efficient, and trust-worthy era of legal practice.
To learn more about the author, Olga V. Mack, a Fellow at CodeX, The Stanford Center for Legal Informatics, and the books she has written on similar topics, explore her works Get on Board: Earning Your Ticket to a Corporate Board Seat, Fundamentals of Smart Contract Security, and Blockchain Value: Transforming Business Models, Society, and Communities. You can also follow Olga on LinkedIn.
Find the original conversation about building trust in legal software on Above the Law.