Legal professionals worldwide should take note of the following developments in appellate litigation during the past week. For more detailed information, please review Howard Bashman’s How Appealing blog, the first web blog dedicated exclusively to appellate litigation.
The Washington Post’s Rachel Weiner recently covered an interesting innovation: a new website that lets law clerks rate their judges. This novel approach to understanding and improving judicial conduct promises to lend a new level of transparency to the profession.
Meanwhile, David Lat’s latest “Exclusive Jurisdiction” column at Bloomberg Law focuses on the necessity of pragmatism, rather than regulation, in the use of AI in legal practice.
Jeffrey F. Laffey provided insights online at The Legal Intelligencer into how Pennsylvania High Court has instigated clarification on a significant strict products liability law question in ‘Sullivan’.
With respect to the Supreme Court’s decision to schedule a full hearing and argument for the Trump Criminal Immunity Case, Rick Hasen shared his insights on his Election Law Blog.
Finally, Adam’s Legal Newsletter elucidates a simplified yet intriguing case of Diaz v. United States in this post. A highly recommended read for all those interested in U.S. Criminal Law.
For more information presented in Howard Bashman’s weekly roundup, check the full details here.