In a series of recent legal transactions, Donald Trump claims that meeting his bond requirement would necessitate asset liquidation at “fire sale prices.” This was humorously equated to the values he previously reported to tax authorities (Yahoo).
Interestingly, the Supreme Court seems to have a difficult time determining which stay order is genuine. This confusion has led to confounding circumstances where some individuals can no longer remain in their positions (Slate).
On another unrelated note, controversy surrounds an anonymous Supreme Court justice who allegedly branded Justice O’Connor as “the worst thing to happen to the Supreme Court.” Investigations have delved deep into identifying the anonymous instigator of this intriguing comment (Balls and Strikes).
Elsewhere in the legal business world, a Biglaw partner openly requests the IRS to detail their plan for apprehending tax evaders moving forward. This reiterates a tongue-in-cheek comparison with criminal organizations wishing to know which communication lines might be surveilled by the FBI (American Lawyer).
Subway franchisees are seemingly more interested in the freshness of their sandwiches than the aesthetic appeal of their eateries. They have opted to involve legal counsel to voice their concerns (Corporate Counsel).
Simultaneously, Trump has appealed to the Supreme Court for absolute immunity. His argument contends that performing presidential duties would be impossible absent some degree of overt criminal activity (Bloomberg Law News).
Lastly, in a surprising turn of events, conservatives are lobbying courts to protect marine life. However, the enthusiasm to safeguard these creatures seems tailored to suit an overarching agenda to hinder renewable energy projects (Law360).