Abortion is once again being deliberated upon at the Supreme Court, with the latest case contesting recent decisions by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). These decisions are targeted to make the drug mifepristone, commonly used in abortions, easily accessible through the mail and via telemedicine services.
During the oral argument that took place on Monday, it appeared that the court that overruled the historic Roe v. Wade is prepared to dismiss the protests laid out by the pro-life Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine. However, this doesn’t signify that the conservative justices have found a newfound appreciation for the right to choose. Instead, it seems several conservatives as well as the three liberal justices are of the opinion that the doctors represented by the Alliance lack legal standing to challenge the FDA’s decisions, as detailed
here.
The Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine was, apparently, unable to demonstrate a direct and substantial impact the FDA’s decisions would have on the doctors it represents. This current stance of the Supreme Court against a flimsy abortion case reinforces the importance of legal standing in any lawsuit intended to challenge actions of the administration. Needless to say, legal professionals in major corporations and law firms must remain vigilant of such precedents when framing their legal arguments. For further information on this ongoing case, feel free to visit the
original article.