Judge John Bush, a federal appeals court judge, recently expressed his belief that the advent of artificial intelligence could greatly benefit courts when settling cases via an originalist lens. This method of judgement involves an in-depth historical analysis of the way words or phrases were used at the time of legislative origination. Read the original article here.
During a Federalist Society event hosted by the University of Chicago Law School, Judge Bush asserted that originalism (a legal philosophy that prompts judges to interpret constitutional provisions as they would have been understood upon their initial drafting) and advancements in AI could work in harmony. This partnership, according to Bush, could even encourage originalism to thrive in the modern courtroom.
‘Originalism’ has been known to inform major rulings in the past, which is why the integration of AI could potentially transform and expedite this process.
In conclusion, Judge Bush’s prediction showcases the possible reinterpretations of how technology, and most specifically AI, can be utilised within the legal sector and the potential it holds for the interpretation of constitutional provisions.