The White House recently announced a final rule that aims to regulate the short-term insurance sector, often referred to as “junk” insurance plans, garnering the support of numerous healthcare advocacy organizations.
The American Medical Association (AMA) expressed its deep appreciation for the new rule, stating in a public statement that it will protect consumers from low-quality health coverage that is often marketed and sold deceptively, causing consumers to mistake it for comprehensive insurance.
The issue arises with short-term health plans intended to support consumers in the transitional phase between one type of coverage and another. These plans are exempt from adhering to the Affordable Care Act’s consumer protections, including coverage guarantees for those with pre-existing conditions. These plans were previously limited to a three-month duration by the Obama administration, but were extended to 12 months with a 3-year renewal option under Project Trump.
“Junk insurance plans” have often surprised families with thousands of dollars in bills because they claim pre-existing conditions are not covered under their scheme. For instance, there have been instances such as a man in Montana facing $43,000 in health care costs for his cancer treatment, or a woman in Pennsylvania slapped with almost $20,000 in bills for an amputation procedure, both claims denied by their insurance plans.
According to the final rule, short-term plans “must be truly short-term” and are confined to a maximum duration of four months. Furthermore, these plans need to provide a disclaimer explicitly outlining their coverage constraints.
The AMA has commented that these changes will lessen the risks to consumers, promote transparency, extend patient protections, and contribute to market stability. Still, these short-term, limited-duration health plans often provide fewer benefits and practice deceitful marketing tactics, convincing people to buy health plans that discriminate based on pre-existing conditions while providing very little, or no, coverage.
The Association for Community Affiliated Plans (ACAP) also supports this move. These ‘junk’ plans might offer consumers lower premiums, but that often comes with an illusion of security and skimpy or even non-existent coverage. The new regulation relegates such short-term insurance plans to their original role as stopgap coverage, thus providing a win for the consumers.
In addition to these, a group of 35 patient organizations, including the American Diabetes Association, the American Heart Association, and March of Dimes have also declared their support for the final rule. They believe that the new rule brings clarity for consumers and provides better assurance about the quality of the health coverage they purchase, as evidenced in their joint statement.
You can read the original article here.