When Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson was first nominated to the United States Supreme Court, she faced demeaning criticism that was heavily laced with racism. An example occurred when a then-Georgetown instructor described the nominee as a “lesser black woman.” This pattern of unjustifiable attacks against certain candidates reveals that some qualified conservatives are keen not just to downplay a Democratic nominee’s accomplishments or qualifications, but to connect their ethnicity to their supposed shortcomings. Such baseless criticism is not unprecedented, as even when Sonia Sotomayor was nominated, a Chicago law professor branded her “a second-class intellect” purely for her Latina ethnicity.
No specific, coherent critique has been established beyond the notion that “minorities and women are dumb and undeserving.” An evident double standard is demonstrated when considering the reception of Amy Coney Barrett, who arguably had half the record Jackson had when she ascended to the Supreme Court. Her appointment did not elicit any notable criticism from those who had issues with Justice Jackson.
The criticism extends beyond academia and into other public spheres. One instance involves evangelical MAGA Pastor Shane Vaughn, who used racial slurs to ridicule Justice Jackson. Following backlash, his attempt at an apology contradicted his “less than sincere” remarks. Instead of apologizing and learning from his mistakes, he continued his offensive remarks, only refraining from commenting on Jackson’s physical appearance while maintaining his racially-charged offensive language.
Despite the troublesome remarks about Justice Jackson, it is vital to remember that in the face of discrimination, it is essential to preserve allegiance to the rule of law and justice for all. This commitment is regardless of the perpetrators, whether they are law professors, religious leaders, or other individuals in positions of influence.