A shift in the United States environmental enforcement regime is stirring questions in the legal circles. A new policy by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) aims to closer coordinate its civil and criminal enforcement teams.
Many corporate attorneys and former federal officials are lauding the move, on the grounds that it will bring about fairer outcomes, cut down unpredictability, and hasten resolutions. This sensible approach adopted by the EPA is not exempt from its share of concerns.
One of the primary apprehensions is the possible escalation of cases from civil to criminal. The policy requires more intercommunication between the civil and criminal enforcement departments to ensure the consistent application of their discretion. The onus of executing this coordination, however, is on the Justice Department, the cooperation of which remains to be seen.
In addition, the plan needs meticulous implementation to avert unintended consequences, one of which is the risk of a higher number of borderline cases falling into the criminal domain. These developments pose significant concerns for legal professionals and corporate entities operating in environmental sectors.
For more details, read the full article here.