Retired Judge David S. Tatel of the D.C. Circuit has voiced strong concerns about the current direction of the United States Supreme Court, labeling its actions a “tragedy” for the rule of law. In his new memoir, Vision: A Memoir of Blindness and Justice, Tatel, who has a distinguished record on the federal bench, highlights what he perceives as the Court’s departure from judicial restraint, a quality that traditionally distinguishes the judiciary from the legislative and executive branches.
Specifically, Tatel critiques Chief Justice John Roberts’ opinions on race, accusing the Supreme Court of disregarding precedents. According to CNN, Tatel’s unease extends to what these decisions might mean for both democracy and the planet.
In excerpts from the book, Tatel reflects on his acceptance of blindness but stresses his alarm over the Supreme Court’s apparent abandonment of established judicial principles. This shift raises significant concerns among legal professionals about the long-term implications for the judiciary’s role in American society.
For more on Judge Tatel’s comments, visit the full article on Above the Law.