Supreme Court’s Conservative Majority Limits Federal Regulatory Powers, Setting Stage for Future Challenges

By ending its term with a stinging combination against federal agencies, the U.S. Supreme Court’s conservative bloc left behind a bruised bureaucracy and a regulatory system that’s now vulnerable to a barrage of incoming attacks. The decisions, announced at the close of the term, have significant implications for federal regulatory bodies tasked with enforcing longstanding…

Read More

Nintendo Files Lawsuit Against Reddit Moderator for Alleged Game Piracy on SwitchPirates Subreddit

By Andrew Karpan (July 1, 2024, 9:39 PM EDT) — Nintendo has initiated legal action against a Reddit moderator responsible for the “SwitchPirates” subreddit, accusing the user of hosting an extensive library of Nintendo Switch games. This move marks Nintendo’s latest effort to combat piracy surrounding its popular gaming console. For further details, the original…

Read More

Legal Giants Clash: UC Regents Defend Trade Secrets Litigation Against Agensys Inc.

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman is representing the Regents of the University of California in a trade secrets dispute initiated by Jones Day on behalf of Agensys Inc. The complaint against UC Regents alleges that Norbert Peekhaus, a key researcher, unlawfully disclosed confidential information concerning cancer research. Peekhaus, who previously led a team at Agensys working…

Read More

Trump Seeks Overturn of NY Felony Conviction After Supreme Court Immunity Ruling

Donald Trump is actively pursuing the dismissal of his New York felony conviction following a significant ruling by the US Supreme Court that grants him substantial immunity from criminal prosecution for actions undertaken during his presidency. Trump’s legal team argues that the Supreme Court’s decision, which underscores protections for sitting presidents, should invalidate his previous…

Read More

California Judge Scrutinizes Bright Data’s Bid to Disqualify Quinn Emanuel in High-Stakes Data Scraping Case

A California federal judge has expressed concerns over Bright Data’s bid to disqualify Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP from representing X Corp. in a lawsuit concerning data scraping practices. During a session on Monday, the judge indicated that Bright Data’s legal representation by Proskauer Rose LLP might be taking a significant risk by not…

Read More

California Court Rules Attorney’s Behavior Annoying But Not Harassing, Denies Permanent Restraining Order

A California appeals court has affirmed a previous finding that a personal injury attorney’s aggressive actions toward another attorney were merely “annoying” and did not rise to the level requiring a permanent restraining order. The court clarified that for behavior to be deemed harassment and warrant such an order, it must be “seriously annoying.” To…

Read More

Ex-Formula One Principal and Publisher Seek Case Dismissal Over Trademark Photo Dispute

Former Haas Automation Inc. Formula One team principal Guenther Steiner and a Penguin Random House LLC subsidiary have filed a request with a federal judge to dismiss Haas Automation Inc.’s trademark lawsuit over photos used in Steiner’s autobiographical book. The suit, filed in the US District Court for the Central District of California, alleges that…

Read More

Supreme Court’s End-of-Term Mop-Up Conference Addresses Key Regulatory and Constitutional Issues

In a routine yet critical “mop-up” conference held on the last day the Supreme Court issued opinions for the term, the justices reviewed 65 cases, among which were 14 newly relisted cert petitions. These petitions span a broad spectrum of legal issues ranging from federal firearm prohibitions for felons to e-cigarette marketing regulations, raising questions…

Read More

Supreme Court’s Overturn of Chevron Deference Likely to Have Minimal Effect on U.S. International Trade Commission, Analysts Say

The recent U.S. Supreme Court decision to overturn the longstanding Chevron deference, which favored federal agencies’ rulemaking interpretations, is expected to have limited impact on the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). According to legal analysts at Polsinelli, the ITC’s congressionally granted authority supports a stable decision-making framework that aligns closely with judicial review standards, differentiating…

Read More

Supreme Court’s Chevron Deference Overturn Expected to Have Minimal Impact on ITC Operations

Legal News Article The recent decision by the U.S. Supreme Court to overrule the Chevron deference, a precedent that had long allowed federal agencies’ rulemaking interpretations to stand unless clearly erroneous, is expected to have a limited impact on the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). The ITC’s operations, which include a particular focus on administering…

Read More

GameStop Investor Retracts Suit Against Roaring Kitty Over Alleged Pump-and-Dump Scheme

Keith Gill, known by his online personas “Roaring Kitty” and “DeepF—Value,” recently faced a lawsuit accusing him of orchestrating a pump-and-dump scheme involving GameStop securities. The lawsuit, filed by GameStop investor Martin Radev, claimed that Gill had deceived his followers on social media platforms like X and Reddit in order to profit from escalating stock…

Read More

Doha Meeting on Afghanistan Draws Criticism for Excluding Women from Key Negotiations

The Doha Meeting on Afghanistan, convened behind closed doors, has raised serious concerns among international observers due to its lack of transparency and the sidelining of women from critical discussions. The meeting, attended by representatives from 25 countries and 5 major international organizations, focused on key issues such as the country’s deteriorating economic conditions, illicit…

Read More

Crowell & Moring and ADL Sue Iran, Syria, North Korea Over Alleged Support for Hamas’ Israel Attack

Crowell & Moring, in partnership with the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), has initiated legal action against Iran, Syria, and North Korea. The lawsuit, filed on behalf of over 125 plaintiffs, alleges that these nations provided material support to Hamas, facilitating the terror attack on Israel on October 7, 2023. The suit, lodged in Washington, D.C., federal…

Read More

Missouri Appeals Court Overturns $1 Million Gym Injury Verdict Citing Assumption of Risk Doctrine

A Missouri appellate court reversed a $1 million jury verdict awarded to Melissa Moody, a gym-goer who sustained injuries during a group exercise class. The decision by the Eastern District of the Missouri Court of Appeals, Second Division, hinged on the doctrine of implied primary assumption of risk. The court concluded that Moody’s frequent attendance…

Read More