Human Rights Watch (HRW) has raised significant concerns regarding the neutrality of Zimbabwe’s upcoming elections. In a statement issued on Wednesday, the organization highlighted that the open support of Zimbabwe’s military commander for the ruling party, ZANU-PF, threatens both the integrity of the electoral process and voter rights.
HRW has urged the Zimbabwean government to disentangle the military from partisan politics and implement reforms to ensure security forces do not compromise election fairness. This appeal is underpinned by Zimbabwe’s commitment to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which mandates that citizens’ right to vote by secret ballot be protected.
Allan Ngari, HRW’s Africa Advocacy Director, remarked, “The Zimbabwe military commander’s open endorsement of the ruling party not only threatens the fairness of elections but opens the door for security force abuses against voters, the opposition, and civil society organizations.” Ngari emphasizes that Zimbabwe’s security forces must adhere to national laws and regulations that align with international human rights standards to ensure fair and free elections.
HRW’s statement responds to recent comments made by Zimbabwe National Army Commander Lt. General Anselem Sanyatwe, who asserted that the military would use force to secure votes for ZANU-PF, claiming the party would rule indefinitely.
The Zimbabwe Constitution’s Section 208(2) prohibits security services from acting in a partisan manner, advancing political interests, or infringing upon individual rights. Section 208(3) further mandates that security service members must not hold active positions within any political party.
Despite these legal frameworks, HRW has documented that Zimbabwe’s security forces have historically interfered in political and electoral processes, often leading to rights violations. Reports of political violence during elections, particularly in 2008, underscore recurring patterns of abuse.
In 2023, ZANU-PF secured victories across the presidency, the national assembly, and the senate, with President Emmerson Mnangagwa retaining power. These results were met with international concern, as watchdogs and nations questioned the election’s legitimacy. HRW claimed that the authorities failed to provide free and fair elections, a stance echoed by Amnesty International, which noted repression of dissent during the same period. Similar apprehensions were raised recently when police arrested an interim opposition leader for conducting an unauthorized gathering.
For more detailed coverage, visit the article on JURIST’s website here.