“Bruen has proven to be a labyrinth for lower courts, including our own, with only the one-dimensional history-and-tradition test as a compass,” wrote Chief Judge Albert Diaz of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, adding that Rahimi has provided “little” clarity.
In his opinion, Judge Diaz expressed frustration over the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, which introduced a historical test for evaluating the constitutionality of gun laws. According to Diaz, the ruling offers insufficient guidance and leaves lower courts grappling with its application. This sentiment seems to resonate widely among the judiciary, reflecting ongoing challenges in interpreting the Second Amendment through this narrow framework.
For a deeper understanding of Judge Diaz’s perspective and the implications for lower courts, you can read more in the original Law.com article.