Federal Judge Rebukes Attorneys in False Advertising Suit Against Dave’s Killer Bread

In a recent legal proceeding, a California federal judge took a firm stance, admonishing attorneys involved in a proposed class action against Dave’s Killer Bread for their alleged deceptive advertising practices. The case centers around claims that the brand’s “Good Seed” bread falsely advertises containing 5 grams of protein per serving. The judge criticized the…

Read More

Tunisia’s Election Body Rejects Court Order Reinstating Disqualified Presidential Candidates

The political landscape in Tunisia has become increasingly contentious as the Independent High Authority for Elections (ISIE) rebuffed a ruling by the country’s Administrative Court that reinstated three disqualified presidential candidates. On Monday, the ISIE confirmed its approval of incumbent President Kais Saied, Zouhair Magzhaoui, and Ayachi Zammel as the final list of candidates for…

Read More

Federal Circuit Evaluates PTAB Ruling’s Impact on Liquidia Technologies’ Hypertension Drug Launch

A Federal Circuit panel on Tuesday grappled with the implications of a Delaware judge’s decision concerning Liquidia Technologies’ ability to launch a hypertension drug. The controversy centers on whether Liquidia could go forward with the launch after a United Therapeutics patent, which the company was previously found to infringe, was deemed unpatentable by the Patent…

Read More

Paul Newman’s Daughters Face Legal Hurdles in Charity Lawsuit Over Alleged Misuse of Funds

Legal News Two daughters of the late Hollywood actor and philanthropist Paul Newman lack standing to pursue a Connecticut state court lawsuit against their father’s charity, Newman’s Own Foundation. The lawsuit claims that the charity failed to provide certain funds designated for donations and misused Paul Newman’s publicity and intellectual property rights. The organization has…

Read More

R.J. Reynolds Seeks Court’s Intervention to Nullify $95 Million Royalty Payments to Altria

Tobacco giant R.J. Reynolds is intensifying efforts to terminate the $95 million in royalty payments it owes to Altria, the parent company of Philip Morris, following a patent infringement verdict. Highlighting arguments to a North Carolina federal court, R.J. Reynolds asserts that its agreement with Juul to license vape pen technology should be enforced retroactively….

Read More

Colorado Appellate Judges Question Validity of $1.85 Million Civil Theft Judgment Over Jury Instructions

On Tuesday, Colorado appellate judges expressed skepticism regarding a claim that a state trial court issued inadequate jury instructions, thereby yielding an excessively high $1.85 million civil theft judgment. The investor in question argued that the judgment was disproportionate, while one of the judges inquired why the investor had not sued his trial counsel over…

Read More

Texas Business Court Inaugurates with Complex Construction Disputes, Marking New Era in Corporate Litigation

The Texas Business Court, created to handle complex business litigation in the state, received its first cases on Tuesday. The court aims to streamline the handling of commercial disputes, potentially providing a more specialized venue for business-related legal issues. Early cases involve contentious construction disputes, indicating the types of issues the court will address moving…

Read More

Federal Circuit Rules Against Video-on-Demand Patent Claims, Favoring Amazon

On Tuesday, the Federal Circuit ruled against a patent licensing entity attempting to enforce patents related to “video-on-demand” programming designed for cable companies. The court stated that the patents in question encompass abstract ideas, which are not eligible for protection under patent law. This decision marks a significant victory for Amazon. The core contention involved…

Read More

HQ Specialty Pharma Seeks to Correct Patent and Block Fresenius Kabi Competitor After Delaware Jury Ruling

HQ Specialty Pharma Corp. has announced plans to address deficiencies in its patent for an injectable calcium supplement. This move follows a recent decision by a federal jury in Delaware, which found the patent partially invalid. According to HQ Specialty, once the corrections are made, they intend to pursue a court order aimed at preventing…

Read More

Amneal Seeks Federal Circuit Support to Affirm Delisting of Teva’s Inhaler Patents from Orange Book

Amneal Pharmaceuticals Inc. is urging the Federal Circuit to preserve a lower court decision that removed inhaler device patents from the Orange Book, an important government database. This delisting was secured following an infringement lawsuit initiated by Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. Amneal argues that the decision properly differentiates between device patents and drug patents, effectively…

Read More

Law Firms Face Evolving Dynamics as Profit Pressures Alter Traditional Partnership Models

The legal industry is witnessing a shift as law firms increasingly prioritize profit and performance over traditional collegial culture. Recent changes include de-equitizing partners, altering compensation structures, expanding non-equity tiers, and mandating business plans. This evolution has led to heightened tensions within partnerships, with some partners choosing to leave their firms in reaction to the…

Read More

Global Law Firms’ Bureaucratic Missteps Create Opportunities for Chinese Competitors in Tough Market

In a recent column, Jessica Seah wrote about the plight of law firm partners and senior lawyers struggling to secure employment amidst a tough market climate in China. Follow-up coverage now suggests that global law firm leaders are inadvertently driving the decline of their Asian offices through bureaucratic inefficiencies and strategic missteps. This trend is…

Read More

Cynosure Accuses Ex-Employees and Rival of Breaching Noncompete Agreements in Federal Court

Medical aesthetic business, Cynosure, presented its case to a Boston federal jury, accusing two former employees and a rival company of orchestrating a “calculated corporate raid.” According to Cynosure, the employees violated multiple noncompete and non-solicitation agreements and transferred confidential trade secrets upon their departure. The claim highlights significant management and legal challenges in enforcing…

Read More

Federal Judge Questions $85.9 Million Navy Software Duplication Claim

During a recent court session, a Federal Circuit judge expressed skepticism regarding a software company’s claim for $85.9 million in damages against the Navy for unauthorized duplication of its software. The judge suggested that the company had not sufficiently demonstrated its right to receive more than the $154,400 previously awarded. This development places the firm’s…

Read More

North Carolina Business Court Limits Damages in Blackbeard’s Shipwreck Imagery Dispute

In a recent development, North Carolina’s Business Court ruled that the state’s cultural resources agency is not responsible for enforcing the terms concerning third-party usage of imagery and video footage of Blackbeard’s shipwreck. The ruling comes as part of an ongoing litigation where the discovering organization sought damages, which the court has now pared down….

Read More