In a recent announcement at a political convention, Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk disclosed plans to temporarily suspend the country’s right to apply for asylum. This decision is part of a broader strategy dubbed “Regain Control, Ensure Security.” The initiative aims to significantly curb irregular migration into Poland, addressing what Tusk describes as the negative impacts of such movements (source).
This policy shift follows a noticeable surge in asylum claims, which reportedly rose by approximately 74% in the first half of 2024. The Prime Minister attributes the increase to a “hybrid war” tactic employed by Belarusian border forces, allegedly assisting migrants to cross into Poland. Tusk further indicated that human traffickers and smugglers are exacerbating the issue (source).
Tusk emphasized that while the proposed suspension seeks to tighten border controls, it does not intend to close Poland off from those wishing to enter for legitimate reasons. He underscored the importance of integration for newcomers, insisting they should adhere to Polish standards and customs.
The plan, however, brings the spotlight onto Poland’s commitments under international law. As a signatory to the European Convention on Human Rights since 1991, Poland is bound to uphold principles like the right to life and protection from torture. These rights are closely linked to the principle of nonrefoulment, which prohibits returning individuals to countries where they face a risk of ill-treatment or death.
The proposed measures by the Polish government will undoubtedly provoke discussion among legal analysts and human rights advocates, especially in relation to Poland’s obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights.