In the latest edition of the How Appealing blog, several key developments in appellate litigation have been highlighted, offering insights into ongoing legal battles that continue to shape the judicial landscape.
The Tallahassee Democrat’s recent coverage on the ongoing trial of Charlie Adelson reveals potential conflicts that previously disrupted proceedings involving the defendant’s mother. For more details, consult the report by Jeff Burlew.
As the 2024 presidential election approaches, Nate Raymond of Reuters examines the limited impact a new president might have on the U.S. judiciary’s future composition. The insights are detailed in the full report.
Another focal point is San Francisco’s internal conflict regarding a Supreme Court appeal linked to the Clean Water Act. CNN’s John Fritze elaborates on this legal tussle, expected to be a favorable Supreme Court decision for the city. The full context can be found here.
An interesting case before the Supreme Court involves Douglas Horn, a truck driver who was terminated after a drug test. Adam Liptak of The New York Times delves into this matter, where Horn challenges the manufacturer of a supposedly THC-free product under a federal racketeering law. Further information is available in the report.
Turning to North Carolina, the candidacy for the Supreme Court is heating up with issues of partisanship and judicial philosophy taking center stage. Kyle Ingram at The News & Observer covers the developing narratives within the state’s judiciary. Explore the full story for additional insights.
On a different note, a new book by Justice Neil Gorsuch has drawn criticism for its portrayal of the legal system. Ankush Khardori, writing for Politico Magazine, critiques the narrative as politically charged and discusses the justice’s response to criticism. Read the full essay here.
For a deeper dive into these stories and their implications for appellate law, visit the full roundup on Above the Law.