In a decisive move causing widespread debate, Mauritius’ Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) Authority has announced a comprehensive ban on social media access throughout the island nation ahead of its general election. This directive, effective until November 11, covers major platforms like Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and X—a development confirmed by the Netblocks Internet Observatory. The administration justified the ban by citing “illegal postings” that potentially threaten national security and public safety, particularly following a recent wiretapping scandal.
The controversy over wiretapping emerged with the disclosure of leaked audio recordings implicating political figures, law enforcement, and journalists. Reporters Without Borders (RSF) raised alarms over the privacy and safety risks for journalists, with the organisation’s Sub-Saharan Africa Director, Sadibou Marong, expressing concern that these leaks point to systematic wiretapping efforts not sparing media professionals. The stakes intensified with the arrest of former Mauritius Telecom CEO Sherry Singh and others in connection with the investigation, though details of charges remain sparse.
Critics of the social media suspension argue it conflicts with constitutional freedoms. Historically, the Mauritian government has respected freedom of expression, according to the US State Department’s 2023 Human Rights Report. This abrupt policy shift drew sharp rebukes from opposition leaders, casting it as “shocking” and “unacceptable” constraints on fundamental rights.
The backdrop to this digital black-out is the electoral campaign of Prime Minister Pravind Kumar Jugnauth, who seeks reelection amidst scrutiny over the government’s handling of the wiretapping revelations. While Mauritius is celebrated for its political stability and democratic governance—evident in its high ranking on the Ibrahim Index of African Governance—this social media ban and the associated surveillance concerns have raised questions about the impacts on electoral integrity.
For comprehensive coverage, access the full article on the JURIST website.