“`html Hogan Lovells’ M&A Partner has made a notable return to Baker McKenzie ahead of Hogan Lovells’ planned exit from Australia. The firm’s offices in Sydney are expected to remain operational until March as part of a strategic withdrawal. For further information, the full article can be accessed here. “`
As patent litigation continues to evolve, several trends are poised to shape the landscape in 2025. The rise in litigation funding has been fueling more contentious disputes, altering the dynamics of patent battles. This increased financial backing allows parties to engage in more protracted legal confrontations, impacting the strategies utilized by patent attorneys and their…
In a recent Senate hearing, a bill aimed at facilitating the process of obtaining patent injunctions has sparked a divided response among stakeholders. The bill’s advocate and supporting speakers argue that it will serve the interests of patent holders, ostensibly promoting innovation and protecting intellectual property. However, detractors caution that the proposed legislation could disproportionately…
Charles Schwab has initiated legal action in a Texas federal court, alleging that a former employee unlawfully acquired confidential trade secrets and client information. The company claims that this information was used to gain a competitive edge after the employee transitioned to a rival firm. This case highlights ongoing challenges in protecting sensitive corporate data…
On December 18, 2024, two appointees of the Biden administration to the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) were scrutinized by a U.S. Senate panel on issues related to tariffs, China, and their approach to considering “public interest” in patent investigations. The nominees were questioned on their strategies to address the economic pivot towards China and…
An administrative law judge at the U.S. International Trade Commission has ruled in favor of Ericsson, determining that Motorola’s mobile phones infringe on patents held by the Swedish telecom company. This legal victory highlights the ongoing tensions in the competitive landscape of 5G technology, where intellectual property plays a crucial role. For further details on…
Paul W. Hughes of McDermott Will & Emery LLP is no stranger to the unpredictable nature of U.S. Supreme Court oral arguments. According to Law360, the atmosphere during oral arguments can range from being made the subject of a justice’s joke to having one’s innovative legal theories welcomed by the entirety of the bench. Considering…
The nature of U.S. Supreme Court oral arguments is fraught with unpredictability, asserts Paul W. Hughes of McDermott Will & Emery LLP. In a dynamic environment where one could find themselves either highlighted by a justice’s humor or having their groundbreaking legal theory fully endorsed by the entire bench, Hughes emphasizes the importance of exhaustive…
In a significant development for the pharmaceutical industry, the newly proposed government spending package aims to keep federal operations running through March, while simultaneously containing a provision that could reshape legal strategies in the biologics sector. The provision sets a cap on the number of patents a biologics manufacturer can assert in efforts to block…
The NFL Players Association has strongly criticized DraftKings Inc.’s recent attempt to dismiss claims in a lawsuit surrounding a contentious licensing agreement. The case involves allegations that the prominent sports betting company did not uphold commitments related to nonfungible tokens (NFTs). The union’s response labeled DraftKings’ motion to dismiss as a maneuver to distort the…
Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation has successfully navigated a legal challenge concerning allegations of chicken price-fixing brought forward by a unit of Burford Capital LLC. Following a judgment from an Illinois federal judge, it has been determined that Pilgrim’s Pride and Sysco Corporation remain bound by a settlement originally agreed upon between the two companies. Burford Capital…
In a recent legal development, TikTok has been ordered to provide its source code along with financial and data usage information to a Chinese company. This decision is part of ongoing litigation where the Chinese entity claims that TikTok misappropriated proprietary information to develop a specific video-editing feature available on its platform. This directive originated…
In a legal win for Johnson & Johnson, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. has faced a setback in its attempt to challenge the validity of a patent concerning a widely-used schizophrenia drug. A New Jersey federal judge dismissed Teva’s claims, which argued that the formula in question was obvious. This decision effectively halts Teva’s efforts to…
In a significant legislative development, a congressional spending package aimed at funding the federal government through March is poised to integrate several bipartisan proposals. These proposals target crucial areas including digital security, pricing transparency in the online sphere, and expanding rural broadband access. This initiative reflects a growing commitment to addressing digital equity and security…
KFC has decided to discontinue the lawsuit it initiated against Church’s Texas Chicken concerning the use of the term “original recipe” for marketing its fried chicken products. This legal action was aimed at preventing Church’s from employing a phrase strongly associated with KFC’s brand identity. Details on the resolution of this dispute, as well as…
In a notable legal development, U.S. District Judge Araceli Martínez-Olguín from the Northern District of California has ruled in favor of Coinbase Global Inc., allowing the cryptocurrency exchange to proceed with its plan to delist the wBTC token. The decision came after BiT Global Digital Ltd. raised objections to the delisting. The judge remarked, “Ultimately,…
Brooklyn US Attorney Breon Peace has announced his resignation, effective January 10, coinciding with the return of former President Donald Trump to office. Peace, appointed by President Biden, reflects on his tenure as the head of the Eastern District of New York, emphasizing the honor he felt serving in this capacity. His departure marks the…
In the latest development of an ongoing legal battle, Texas personal injury attorney Tony Buzbee has levelled new accusations against Shawn “Jay-Z” Carter. Buzbee claims that the rapper’s company, Roc Nation, in conjunction with the law firm Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP, has been involved in recruiting and financially motivating former Buzbee clients to…
In a recent discussion with Law360, U.S. District Judge Amos L. Mazzant shared insights into the future of the Eastern District of Texas (EDTX) as he prepares to assume the role of chief judge in March. Responsible for one of the nation’s most active patent dockets, EDTX has been a significant venue for patent litigation….
U.S. District Judge Amos L. Mazzant recently engaged in a comprehensive discussion with Law360, shedding light on his upcoming role as the principal judge for the Eastern District of Texas, the nation’s busiest patent docket. With his new position commencing in March, Mazzant’s role will be crucial in shaping the legal landscape in this pivotal…
The U.S. Supreme Court has decided to review a case involving the state of South Carolina’s attempt to end its Medicaid provider agreement with Planned Parenthood. This review follows a decision from the Fourth Circuit court that prevented the state from proceeding with its plan. The key issue at hand is whether the Medicaid Act…
Senator Chris Van Hollen, a Democrat from Maryland, has once again faced obstacles in his attempt to expedite the confirmation process for ten judicial nominees in the District of Columbia. The effort to fast-track these confirmations was unsuccessful, signaling a low likelihood that the existing vacancies will be addressed before the onset of the new…
In a rare display of bipartisan accord, Representatives Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) and Lou Correa (D-Calif.) are calling on President Joe Biden to rethink his stance on the veto of the JUDGES Act. The bill aims to amend the number of federal judgeships for the first time in decades in a bid to ease the burdens…
The Federal Circuit has reversed a $13 million jury verdict against NCR Corp., which was accused of infringing on two payment processing patents. The decision, made on Wednesday, concluded that the company was not liable for its customers’ usage of the patented system, in accordance with the precedent set by the appellate court. This outcome…
A Boston federal judge is currently evaluating whether to interpret a pair of $5 million jury awards against medical device sales employees as part of a larger $15 million damages claim against their employer. This case stems from allegations of employee poaching by a rival company. The court deliberations could potentially reshape the boundaries of…